2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12200-2_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting Reducible, Powerful, and Relatively Irreducible Multivariate Polynomials over Finite Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For r ≥ 3 and d ≥ 4r − 8, the following upper bound holds: Proof. Let c k,r = (2ek) r(r+1)(k 2 +1)+4rg k,r for k ∈ N. According to (9) and Theorem 13, we have the inequality #R…”
Section: The Number Of F Q -Reducible Curvesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For r ≥ 3 and d ≥ 4r − 8, the following upper bound holds: Proof. Let c k,r = (2ek) r(r+1)(k 2 +1)+4rg k,r for k ∈ N. According to (9) and Theorem 13, we have the inequality #R…”
Section: The Number Of F Q -Reducible Curvesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The inequality (9) shows that an upper bound on the number of F q -reducible cycles in P r of dimension 1 and degree d can be deduced from an upper bound on the degree of the Chow variety C d,r of curves over F q of degree d in P r . In order to obtain an upper bound on the latter, we consider a suitable variant of the approach of Kollár [18, Exercise I.3.28] (see also [12]).…”
Section: The Degree Of the Chow Variety Of Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our proof of (3) appears to be simple compare with these references. Finally, in the forthcoming [10], the formula I(z) is also obtained and applied to get an approximation: I n = N n −q bn+ν−1 (1 + 2/q + O(1/q 2 )), where ν and n 5 are fixed, while q grows to infinity. The end of this section is devoted to the proof of Theorem 1.…”
Section: Irreducible Polynomials: Degreementioning
confidence: 99%