2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3115026
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting graphene layers on glass via optical reflection microscopy

Abstract: We show that optical reflection microscopy is a reliable method to simultaneously locate and count graphene layers deposited on bulk, transparent substrates such as soda-lime glass. The visible contrast in optical reflection versus graphene layer number is resolvable on bulk substrates. A simple Fresnel theory based on the universal optical conductance of graphene layers accurately models optical reflection images taken at a wavelength of 550±5 nm. We directly count one to nine layers of graphene using reflect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
82
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Raman spectrum of FLG thicker than five layers can be hardly distinguished from that of bulk graphite, as the stepwise broadened 2D band approaching that of bulk graphite due to continuous splitting of valence and conduction bands. The number of graphene layers can also be determined by SEM [142], Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) [143], nanoindentation [144], optical reflection microscopy [145] and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [146,147].
10.1080/14686996.2018.1494493-F0008Figure 8.Evolution of the (a) 514 nm and (b) 633 nm Raman spectra near the 2D peak with the number of graphene layers [140] (reused with permission from [140] Copyright © 2006 American Physical Society.
…”
Section: The Structure Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Raman spectrum of FLG thicker than five layers can be hardly distinguished from that of bulk graphite, as the stepwise broadened 2D band approaching that of bulk graphite due to continuous splitting of valence and conduction bands. The number of graphene layers can also be determined by SEM [142], Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) [143], nanoindentation [144], optical reflection microscopy [145] and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [146,147].
10.1080/14686996.2018.1494493-F0008Figure 8.Evolution of the (a) 514 nm and (b) 633 nm Raman spectra near the 2D peak with the number of graphene layers [140] (reused with permission from [140] Copyright © 2006 American Physical Society.
…”
Section: The Structure Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the dielectric substrate does not show any measurable nonlinear signal, the nonlinear contrast is very large and limited only by the noise from the detector: for a mono- layer C ¼ 1:7 Â 10 6 compared to C ¼ 0:08 for standard optical reflection microscopy [9]. (Enhanced imaging of carbon nanotubes using nonlinear optics has been recently observed in Ref.…”
Section: Prl 105 097401 (2010) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 4 we compare the images measured by four-wave mixing to those obtained on the same flakes by the standard optical reflection microscopy [9,15]. The striking difference in the visibility of the flakes can be quantified in terms of the image contrast, defined as…”
Section: Prl 105 097401 (2010) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations