2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4970483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting forbidden patterns in irregularly sampled time series. II. Reliability in the presence of highly irregular sampling

Abstract: We are motivated by real-world data that exhibit severe sampling irregularities such as geological or paleoclimate measurements. Counting forbidden patterns has been shown to be a powerful tool towards the detection of determinism in noisy time series. They constitute a set of ordinal symbolic patterns that cannot be realised in time series generated by deterministic systems. The reliability of the estimator of the relative count of forbidden patterns from irregularly sampled data has been explored in two rece… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By knowing the exact form of random ordinal networks, we can also estimate the fraction of missing transi- tions in empirical time series. This analysis is somewhat similar to the one of missing permutations or forbidden patterns introduced by Amigó et al [30][31][32] and explored by several works [33][34][35]. These works have observed that some ordinal patterns cannot occur in chaotic systems [for instance, the permutation (2, 1, 0) never appears in logistic map under fully developed chaos] and that even stochastic processes may present missing ordinal patterns depending on the time series length and the choice of embedding dimension.…”
Section: B Random Ordinal Networksupporting
confidence: 67%
“…By knowing the exact form of random ordinal networks, we can also estimate the fraction of missing transi- tions in empirical time series. This analysis is somewhat similar to the one of missing permutations or forbidden patterns introduced by Amigó et al [30][31][32] and explored by several works [33][34][35]. These works have observed that some ordinal patterns cannot occur in chaotic systems [for instance, the permutation (2, 1, 0) never appears in logistic map under fully developed chaos] and that even stochastic processes may present missing ordinal patterns depending on the time series length and the choice of embedding dimension.…”
Section: B Random Ordinal Networksupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We then compared these distributions to the pH distribution in bead-tion centered at 0 with non-zero values, suggesting each individual phagosome has an independent target phagolysosomal pH (Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI133938DS1). The ordinal pattern analysis was repeated on several other strains and conditions throughout the project and at no point did we observe forbidden ordinal patterns (Supplemental Figure 2A), again suggesting the process exhibits no signature of deterministic chaos (22)(23)(24)(25). Given that beads are inert and cannot modify pH, we reasoned that their corresponding phagolysosomes would be the closest approximation of a default acidification state and would therefore represent a baseline to which we could compare phagolysosome acidification dynamics in other conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To determine whether phagolysosomal acidification is a deterministic or stochastic dynamical process, we employed a permutation spectrum test (21) in which the distribution of ordinal patterns occurring in subsets of our full data set was analyzed ( Figure 1C). Ordinal patterns simply refer to the order of each measurement in terms of value, in our case the phagolysosomal pH, within a scanning window, which parses all measurements within each condition, exemplified in Figure 1 (22)(23)(24)(25). Here we found a 4-unit window size to be the most appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I would like to pay attention how the researches of Refs. [74,[90][91][92] will develop in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%