2003
DOI: 10.1080/741954251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting for something! Recognising women's contribution to the global economy through alternative accounting systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A large part of women's work time is devoted to direct care work (child care and caring for old/sick) and indirect care (fetching water & firewood, cooking, cleaning, food processing) (Blackden and Canagarajah, 2003;Ilahi, 2000;Sikod, 2007). These tasks are not accounted in national accounts and thus, remain invisible in the economy (Beneria, 1992;Waring, 2003). Elson and Evers (1997) report that about 66% of women's work goes unrecorded in the national accounts.…”
Section: Time-use and Poverty In Rural Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large part of women's work time is devoted to direct care work (child care and caring for old/sick) and indirect care (fetching water & firewood, cooking, cleaning, food processing) (Blackden and Canagarajah, 2003;Ilahi, 2000;Sikod, 2007). These tasks are not accounted in national accounts and thus, remain invisible in the economy (Beneria, 1992;Waring, 2003). Elson and Evers (1997) report that about 66% of women's work goes unrecorded in the national accounts.…”
Section: Time-use and Poverty In Rural Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marilyn Waring argued in Counting for Nothing: What Men Value and What Women Are Worth , originally published in 1988, that the gendered labor done primarily by women is actually both unpaid and largely invisible to global means measuring economic productivity precisely because it is private. In a follow-up essay, Waring (2003) points out that, historically, work that is "consumed" inside the home is considered private household labor and thus is invisible to economic measures; only work "produced" to be consumed by others is measured by economic measures such as the United Nations System of National Accounts. Thus, paid caregiving done outside of private relations has economic value, whereas work done inside the home by unpaid caregivers who are generally family or friends is significantly devalued by society's primary economic and other social measurements.…”
Section: Division Of Labor Is Unjustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is part of a change in the sociocultural perception and valuation of any such thing as "women's work." We should no longer devalue unpaid work such as caregiving simply because it is unpaid, simply because it cannot easily be measured in economic terms (Folbre 2001;Waring 2003Waring , 2004, simply because it is done by women and, even when paid, receives a lower wage.…”
Section: Division Of Labor Is Unjustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estas definiciones son una base para evaluar las tasas de empleo y desempleo, entre otros indicadores de productividad de un país. Por el contrario, el trabajo no remunerado no es contabilizado como insumo productivo por la UNSNA (United Nations System of National Accounts) y, por lo general, no es medido (Hoskyns y Rai, 2007;Waring, 2008). Entonces, el trabajo que no es medido no es considerado como una contribución oficial a la economía.…”
Section: ¿Qué Es Trabajo? Las Tenues Fronteras Entre Trabajo Formal unclassified