1986
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(86)90021-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting efficiencies of six commercial particle counters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This CPC is an absolute counting device with a nearly 100% counting efficiency above 20 nm up to several m (Heim, Kasper, Reischl, & Gerhart, 2004;Wen & Kasper, 1986).…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This CPC is an absolute counting device with a nearly 100% counting efficiency above 20 nm up to several m (Heim, Kasper, Reischl, & Gerhart, 2004;Wen & Kasper, 1986).…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CPC was checked periodically and known to be 100% efficient in the size range of interest. CPCs are generally more reliable than OPCs with respect to counting efficiency in the range just under 1 m (Wen & Kasper, 1986). …”
Section: Experimental Setup and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Quant et al used a previously calibrated TSI 3022 CPC as the reference instrument, whereas Ankilov et al worked with the mean concentration of all participating test instruments. The present study uses a TSI 3010 CPC as reference but in the single-particle count mode, which is considered absolute because inlet losses in that particle size range are negligible (Wen and Kasper 1986;Niida et al 1988). 4 M. HEIM ET AL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%