2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.01.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterpulsation: A concept with a remarkable past, an established present and a challenging future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The EuroSCORE of all 197 patients in this study was 6.48±3.16 (117), there were no statistical differences between the 0–120 and >120 min groups (P>0.05). This suggested that the operative risks of patients in both groups were similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EuroSCORE of all 197 patients in this study was 6.48±3.16 (117), there were no statistical differences between the 0–120 and >120 min groups (P>0.05). This suggested that the operative risks of patients in both groups were similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Because IABP improved tissue perfusion to avoid progression of SIRS and MODS, patients had a chance to recover during the most dangerous part of the perioperative phase. The application of IABP in cardiac surgery has increased (17), and the rate of application of IABP in the cardiac surgery department of our hospital increased from 1.72% in 2011 to 4.78% in 2014.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapeutic usage of IABP is well known and accepted treatment strategy to reverse or prevent moderate LCOS owing to hibernating or stunned myocardium after acute coronary syndrome, during percutaneous cardiac interventions, along malign ventricular arrhythmias, and after mechanical complications of myocardial infarction [51]. High-risk patients undergoing cardiac operations may be also protected against adverse outcomes [52,53].…”
Section: Cardiomyopathies -Types and Treatments 422mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when IABP support has only limited positive impact on cardiac hemodynamics, it cannot maintain adequate cardiac output in patients with decompensated severe left HF or reduce clinical symptoms and hemodynamic signs. In such cases, this hemodynamic supportive strategy must be complemented by more advanced MCS devices [50].Therapeutic usage of IABP is well known and accepted treatment strategy to reverse or prevent moderate LCOS owing to hibernating or stunned myocardium after acute coronary syndrome, during percutaneous cardiac interventions, along malign ventricular arrhythmias, and after mechanical complications of myocardial infarction [51]. High-risk patients undergoing cardiac operations may be also protected against adverse outcomes [52,53].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis [ 1 ] reported that preoperative and 30-day mortality was significantly lower in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) plus perioperative IABP. IABP is sometimes used in ventricular arrhythmia and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [ 2 ]. Using IABP in thrombolytic therapy increases the survival rate of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and CS [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%