2015
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2015.007116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterpropagating wave acoustic particle manipulation device for the effective manufacture of composite materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholz, et al has demonstrated 13 that the acoustic patterning of various spherical and cylindrical microparticles was generated near the bottom surface of the device due to the high force distribution. To better define the optimum parameters for acoustic trapping of live cells and to help predict their behaviour under ultrasonic conditions, deposition studies were thus carried out.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Scholz, et al has demonstrated 13 that the acoustic patterning of various spherical and cylindrical microparticles was generated near the bottom surface of the device due to the high force distribution. To better define the optimum parameters for acoustic trapping of live cells and to help predict their behaviour under ultrasonic conditions, deposition studies were thus carried out.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work the transducers were operated away from their resonance (closer to anti-resonance) such that these cavity resonances will dominate the trapping field. A thorough experimental and theoretical finite element analysis of the operation of this type of device was given by Scholz et al 13 . Their results demonstrate the existence of the standing wave field but also show that it is confined to a thin layer above the bottom plate.…”
Section: Cancer and Non-cancer Cell Viability And Metabolic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3D fluorescence confocal image stacks of the 1D micropatterned monoliths revealed that the stripe patterns originated from density differences in the hydrogel network, and extended ≈70 µm in height from the underlying substrate before becoming incoherent (Figure c,d). We attributed this to the progressive reduction in the acoustic pressure field along the vertical direction of the sample chamber and disintegration of the nontrapped coacervate microdroplets present in these low‐pressure regions into a disordered hydrogel network . In contrast, the stripe patterns produced at the base of the hydrogels were attributed to immobilization of the coacervate microdroplets at the acoustic nodal points due to their strong interaction with the surface of the sample cavity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of previous work in acoustic particle assembly is based on acoustic resonators, which arrange many particles along extended traps that coincide with either nodes or antinodes of the standing pressure waves . The attainable shapes depend on acoustic modes of the chamber or superpositions of those.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%