2015
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Countermovement Jump Performance Is Not Affected During an In-Season Training Microcycle in Elite Youth Soccer Players

Abstract: This study examined the change in countermovement jump (CMJ) performance across a microcycle of training in professional soccer players during the in-season period. Nine elite youth soccer players performed a CMJ test pre and post four consecutive soccer training sessions of an in-season weekly microcycle. Training load was quantified using global positioning systems (GPS), heart rate (HR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Absolute change (pre to post training) in CMJ height across each training session … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
48
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
48
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…35,36 However, in the current study, a nonsignificant trivial to small relationship was found between changes in CMJ height and total high-speedrunning distance accumulation over 2 to 4 days. Collectively, the findings from the current study and those from earlier investigations, 9,37 demonstrate that CMJ height is generally insensitive to acute changes in workload in elite soccer players. CMJ height alone may be too crude of a measure to detect changes in training load, however, alternative CMJ derived neuromuscular parameters may hold sensitivity to alterations in load irrespective of the limited change in CMJ height.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…35,36 However, in the current study, a nonsignificant trivial to small relationship was found between changes in CMJ height and total high-speedrunning distance accumulation over 2 to 4 days. Collectively, the findings from the current study and those from earlier investigations, 9,37 demonstrate that CMJ height is generally insensitive to acute changes in workload in elite soccer players. CMJ height alone may be too crude of a measure to detect changes in training load, however, alternative CMJ derived neuromuscular parameters may hold sensitivity to alterations in load irrespective of the limited change in CMJ height.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The aim would be, on the one hand, to avoid players being fatigued on match day, and on the other hand, to increase the status of training among players, optimizing physical fitness and thus being able to give maximum performance on competition day. Previous studies (Impellizzeri et al, 2005; McLean et al, 2010; Nédélec et al, 2012b; Casamichana et al, 2013; Gastin et al, 2013; Gaudino et al, 2013; Colby et al, 2014; Los Arcos et al, 2014a; Henderson et al, 2015; Malone et al, 2015; Thorpe et al, 2015; Akenhead et al, 2016; Gabbett, 2016; Gabbett et al, 2016) have analyzed the load placed on players in training and matches, but none have compared the load accumulated by the players in a training microcycle normalized to the physical demands of competition, despite being a practice used by elite teams as a means of training status (Akenhead and Nassis, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol followed is similar to that of Malone et al (2015). Prior to the test the players did a standard warm up including a 5 min low speed run with dynamic exercises and two 20 m progressions followed by three repeats of the jump.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CMJ was not sensitive as a measure of neuromuscular status in EPL players when analyzed alongside daily fluctuations in training load, furthermore, data derived from elite rugby sevens and adolescent soccer players revealed no change in countermovement jump height or correlation to training load during a taper and across a training period respectively. [48][49][50] The use of jump height per se as a global indicator of neuromuscular function may lack the sensitivity to detect changes in training load in previous studies. Moreover, CMJ height alone may mask alternative neuromuscular measures and their sensitivity to alterations in load.…”
Section: Neuromuscular Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%