2014
DOI: 10.1111/cdep.12061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterfactual Reasoning: Sharpening Conceptual Distinctions in Developmental Studies

Abstract: Counterfactual reasoning (CFR)—mentally representing what the world would be like now if things had been different in the past—is an important aspect of human cognition and the focus of research in areas such as philosophy, social psychology, and clinical psychology. More recently, it has also gained broad interest in cognitive developmental psychology, mainly focusing on the question of how this kind of reasoning can be characterized. Studies have been inconsistent in identifying when children can use CFR. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(56 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there is considerable disagreement amongst cognitive developmental psychologists over when children can think counterfactually (Beck & Riggs, 2014;Rafetseder & Perner, 2014). Much of this debate hinges on whether children may be able to answer some types of counterfactual questions without actually engaging in counterfactual thought (Beck, 2016;Rafetseder et al, 2010Rafetseder et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Stage (C): Linear Event-independent Time (4-5 Years)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there is considerable disagreement amongst cognitive developmental psychologists over when children can think counterfactually (Beck & Riggs, 2014;Rafetseder & Perner, 2014). Much of this debate hinges on whether children may be able to answer some types of counterfactual questions without actually engaging in counterfactual thought (Beck, 2016;Rafetseder et al, 2010Rafetseder et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Stage (C): Linear Event-independent Time (4-5 Years)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it also allowed us to address a further issue regarding the flexibility with which children make spontaneous counterfactual comparisons. One claim in the literature (see Rafetseder & Perner, 2012;Rafetseder & Perner, 2014) is that younger children's emotions in a box-choosing task may be underpinned by just the simple thought that ''I do not have the best prize" (or conversely ''I do not have the worst prize") and thus are best described as frustration rather than regret. This explanation implies that (a) younger children's emotions are not the result of counterfactual thinking and (ii) the comparisons children make between what they obtained and what else was available are inflexible.…”
Section: Single Reference Point Versus Multiple Reference Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Does this mean that we can rule out an explanation of children's emotions in terms of simple frustration rather than regret or relief (see Rafetseder & Perner, 2012;Rafetseder & Perner, 2014)? We are assuming that this question remains open even under circumstances in which participants have full responsibility for the choice that led to the outcome and full feedback has been given (see O'Connor, McCormack, Beck, & Feeney, 2015).…”
Section: Single Reference Point Versus Multiple Reference Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations