2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2015.7353783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterfactual reasoning about intent for interactive navigation in dynamic environments

Abstract: Abstract-Many modern robotics applications require robots to function autonomously in dynamic environments including other decision making agents, such as people or other robots. This calls for fast and scalable interactive motion planning. This requires models that take into consideration the other agent's intended actions in one's own planning. We present a real-time motion planning framework that brings together a few key components including intention inference by reasoning counterfactually about potential… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intention aware reactive avoidance scheme proposed by [24] uses counterfactual reasoning to calculate probabilities over a possible set of navigational goals. Using such probability set, this approach predicts human motion towards most probable goal and generates locally optimal motions for multiple robots.…”
Section: Planning For the Robot And The Humanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intention aware reactive avoidance scheme proposed by [24] uses counterfactual reasoning to calculate probabilities over a possible set of navigational goals. Using such probability set, this approach predicts human motion towards most probable goal and generates locally optimal motions for multiple robots.…”
Section: Planning For the Robot And The Humanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using simulations as models Models provide numerous advantages in machine learning [12], enabling inferences from limited data, and in planning [13], enabling counter-factual reasoning [14] and guided search. However, defining the structure of models in a way that leads to efficient inference while maintaining fidelity to complex arrangements of physical causes tends to be non-trivial.…”
Section: Related Work and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third set of constraints (5) ensures that every node is allocated to exactly one computer -note that since a ROS node cannot assume two different settings at the same time, it is not necessary to add an extra restriction to guarantee that exactly one setting of each node is allocated. The last set of constraints (6) ensures that the overall value for any combination of weights for the nodes is always the same. Finally, we add two new sets of constraints to the model, which specifically apply to distributed ROS systems.…”
Section: Problems Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%