2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.92.062308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterfactual distribution of Schrödinger cat states

Abstract: In the counterfactual cryptography scheme proposed by Noh (2009), the sender Alice probabilistically transmits classical information to the receiver Bob without the physical travel of a particle. Here we generalize this idea to the distribution of quantum entanglement. The key insight is to replace their classical input choices with quantum superpositions. We further show that the scheme can be generalized to counterfactually distribute multi-partite cat states.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be ignored, however, for large M. Given ideal implementation, the fidelity of our protocol for counterfactual transport approaches unity for N ≫ M ≫ 1, where N and M are the number of inner and outer cycles respectively. We draw the reader's attention to the fact that the posting of our protocol on the arXiv in 2014 [2] has triggered a number of related papers including, Guo et al [3], Li et al [4], Vaidman [5], and Shenoy-Hejamadi and Srikanth [6]. We plan a separate reply to Vaidman's Comment [5].…”
Section: An Addendum On Protocol For Counterfactually Transporting Anmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be ignored, however, for large M. Given ideal implementation, the fidelity of our protocol for counterfactual transport approaches unity for N ≫ M ≫ 1, where N and M are the number of inner and outer cycles respectively. We draw the reader's attention to the fact that the posting of our protocol on the arXiv in 2014 [2] has triggered a number of related papers including, Guo et al [3], Li et al [4], Vaidman [5], and Shenoy-Hejamadi and Srikanth [6]. We plan a separate reply to Vaidman's Comment [5].…”
Section: An Addendum On Protocol For Counterfactually Transporting Anmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Once Salih et al published their protocol, various implementations began to appear [23,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. While many of these don't make use of polarisation, some do, alongside wider modal-style analyses of the protocol [41,62].…”
Section: Photon Only Travels Erroneously -Unequal Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though counterfactual quantum cryptography may not be so useful for long-distance communication, it is interesting conceptually [104,105]. Schemes to improve the efficiency of counterfactual quantum key distribution protocols [106,107], security analysis of such schemes under various attacks such as intercept-resend and counterfactual attacks [108][109][110], experimental realisation using different set-ups [25,111,112], direct communication protocols [113] and counterfactual generation and distribution of entanglement [114] have contributed towards better understanding of applying counterfactuality. The basic idea of the direct communication protocol is to ensure counterfactual transfer of information using the chained beamsplitter approach mentioned earlier.…”
Section: Counterfactual Quantum Cryptographymentioning
confidence: 99%