2019
DOI: 10.58680/rte201930035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counter-Storytelling vs. Deficit Thinking around African American Children and Families, Digital Literacies, Race, and the Digital Divide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pedagogical approaches that expose marginalized students to simplified and belittling remedial curricula have merely been digitized, further entrenching these issues in the educational landscape (Watkins, 2018) and raising concerns about how educational technologies are implemented and framed in schools (Heinrich et al, 2020). And although the digital divide is very real, it has often been used to frame marginalized communities, especially African Americans, from a deficit perspective (e.g., Brock et al, 2010; Lewis Ellison & Solomon, 2019) and justify reforms that prioritize investment in educational technologies at the expense of other crucial areas (Cuban, 2001; Greene, 2021; van Dijck, 2021). Amid these complexities, we suggest that ecological orientations to studying AI platforms in writing instruction can center educational equity in research and surface these intersecting, dynamic relations between writing and platforms in teaching and learning contexts.…”
Section: An Ecological Framework For Examining Writing and Platformiz...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pedagogical approaches that expose marginalized students to simplified and belittling remedial curricula have merely been digitized, further entrenching these issues in the educational landscape (Watkins, 2018) and raising concerns about how educational technologies are implemented and framed in schools (Heinrich et al, 2020). And although the digital divide is very real, it has often been used to frame marginalized communities, especially African Americans, from a deficit perspective (e.g., Brock et al, 2010; Lewis Ellison & Solomon, 2019) and justify reforms that prioritize investment in educational technologies at the expense of other crucial areas (Cuban, 2001; Greene, 2021; van Dijck, 2021). Amid these complexities, we suggest that ecological orientations to studying AI platforms in writing instruction can center educational equity in research and surface these intersecting, dynamic relations between writing and platforms in teaching and learning contexts.…”
Section: An Ecological Framework For Examining Writing and Platformiz...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, search engines such as Google and the algorithms add to the perpetuation of how systemic racism is reflected throughout digital technologies. More specifically, whenever the term "digital divide" is mentioned, the algorithms have been known to display images of only Black and Brown students that reveal how deficit and racist ideologies and biases contain within themselves similar oppressive structures that dehumanize Black people (Benjamin, 2019; Lewis Ellison & Solomon, 2019;Noble, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%