1969
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1969.30.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Countable retracing functions and Π20predicates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We give a proof here for the convenience of the reader. By Jockusch and McLaughlin [28,Theorem 4.13], there is an increasing function f such that X T f and f T g for every function g that dominates f . Now for x 1 < x 2 < · · · < x n , let c(x 1 , .…”
Section: Principles 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We give a proof here for the convenience of the reader. By Jockusch and McLaughlin [28,Theorem 4.13], there is an increasing function f such that X T f and f T g for every function g that dominates f . Now for x 1 < x 2 < · · · < x n , let c(x 1 , .…”
Section: Principles 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A string is a function whose domain is a finite initial segment of N. If / is a function and j e N, we define [f] 3 to be the restriction of / to {k: k < j}. Thus if / is total, [/] y is a string for all j.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1 ⇐⇒ 2) follows from results of Jockusch and McLaughlin in [7]; see also [16, XII.2.14(d)]. The forward implication (1 =⇒ 3) was proven in Chapter 8 of [15], and its converse is immediate from Theorem 3.2.…”
Section: Every Degree In Autspmentioning
confidence: 81%