2000
DOI: 10.1177/0011000000281006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counseling Psychology in Israel

Abstract: This article discusses the status of counseling psychology in Israel in the context of its unique characteristics. Despite the respected status of psychology as a profession in Israel and its overall acceptance and involvement in numerous social issues, counseling psychology as a separate specialty is nonexistent, especially because of resistance to the clinical psychology specialty. In addition to general subjects where counseling may be applied, special problem areas-including continuous security threats, ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only program that was running for several years in Tel Aviv University was obliged to close because of the Israeli Psychological Association's refusal to accredit this program's graduates. The main reason was a lack of agreement as to the uniqueness and scope of relevance of counseling psychologists versus clinical psychologists (Barak & Golan, 2000). It is only recently that a first step toward solving this problem of accreditation was made, with the Israeli Parliament's decision to change the Psychologist Law (2010) and redefine psychological treatment in more general terms, that is, as "any treatment that is relevant to psychological professional training" rather than "psychotherapy" alone.…”
Section: The Narrow Boundaries Of Formal Counseling In Israelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only program that was running for several years in Tel Aviv University was obliged to close because of the Israeli Psychological Association's refusal to accredit this program's graduates. The main reason was a lack of agreement as to the uniqueness and scope of relevance of counseling psychologists versus clinical psychologists (Barak & Golan, 2000). It is only recently that a first step toward solving this problem of accreditation was made, with the Israeli Parliament's decision to change the Psychologist Law (2010) and redefine psychological treatment in more general terms, that is, as "any treatment that is relevant to psychological professional training" rather than "psychotherapy" alone.…”
Section: The Narrow Boundaries Of Formal Counseling In Israelmentioning
confidence: 99%