In his presidential letter addressed to fellow educational psychologists, Travers (1964) began by saying :Since the turn of the century, the status and influence of educational psychology have shown cycles more typical of a business than of a science. The strong initiative taken by earl giants in the area, such as Judd and Thorndike, was not fully exploited, partly because these men J d not leave behind a group of devoted followers to dedicate their lives to a tradition . . . by 1940 there was hardly a school of education in the country that had a laboratory in which experimental approaches to the stud of learning could be pursued . . . However, the revival of educational psychology in the last decadre is striking (p. 1).An indication of such revival could be detected early in the fifties when Stroud (1951, p. 281) commented that, "what amounts to a kind of self-consciousness in educational psychology is indicated in a number of ways." However, more than a decade later an almost identical picture was drawn by Travers (1964, p. 1) who said: "Perhaps it is too soon to say that a discipline has emerged, but one can say that there is an emerging discipline."What, then, does this "emerging discipline" look like, if there is, in fact, a discipline? Who are educational psychologists and what characteristics differentiate them from the rest of psychologists? These questions on the identity and status of the "discipline" prompted the present study of certain educational and vocational characteristics of the membership of the Division of Educational Psychology of the American Psychological Association.The subjects are those members of Division 15 (Educational Psychology) who are listed in the 1963 APA Directory as Fellows (315 in number) and Members (858) of the Division. Excluded from the study are those listed as Associates (159) and also those new Members since January 1, 1963.In addition to classifying and anlyzing information from the 1963 Directory, Division 15 membership's publication activities were investigated by perusing the Psychological Abstracts for the period 1954-63.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
Sex and Age of MembershipMales comprise 85 per cent of the total divisional membership of 1173. Overwhelming male majorities are observed for both Fellows (89 per cent) and Members (84 per cent). The results would seem to suggest a lag in recruitment, selection, and preparation of females, especially from among "field personnel." It further suggests an absence of well-established communication between educational psychologists and other educational personnel.Fellows of the Division ranged in age from 35 to 87 with a mode of 51 and a median of 58.2, while Members ranged from 24 t o 76 with a mode of 35 and a mediah of 43.2. Both age distributions are positively skewed and, when combined, the total membership distribution (1139 age-reporting members) has a mode of 35 and a median of 45.7.