2009
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/150/2/022057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coulomb gap revisited – a renormalisation approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The co-efficient α is basically independent of the type of lattice, the filling fraction, and the details of the disorder 33,34 . We find a value α ≈ 0.35 ± 0.01 consistent with previous numerical studies 32,35 , but substantially smaller than Efros' analytical estimate 2/π 28 . The standard Coulomb gap shows up in transport as a stretched exponential resistance of the form…”
Section: Modelsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The co-efficient α is basically independent of the type of lattice, the filling fraction, and the details of the disorder 33,34 . We find a value α ≈ 0.35 ± 0.01 consistent with previous numerical studies 32,35 , but substantially smaller than Efros' analytical estimate 2/π 28 . The standard Coulomb gap shows up in transport as a stretched exponential resistance of the form…”
Section: Modelsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…W ≫ e 2 /a, where a is the typical distance between neighboring electrons. In that case, the Coulomb gap is theoretically predicted 30,31 and empirically found 32 to be essentially universal at low energies: ρ(E) exhibits linear variation, ρ(E) = α e 4 |E|. The co-efficient α is basically independent of the type of lattice, the filling fraction, and the details of the disorder 33,34 .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…( 1) and (2) were derived for the case when the bare DOS, which is the DOS without Coulomb interactions, has a non-zero value at ǫ = 0. The primary method for quantitative, theoretical study of the Coulomb gap is through computer simulations [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], which mostly confirm the above results for the 1P-DOS. The most important experimental manifestation of the Coulomb gap is its effect on the variable range hopping conductivity σ, which as a consequence of the Coulomb gap obeys the law [4],…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, such strong, exponential depletion of the 1P-DOS was never seen in computer experiments [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. For large simulated samples this is the case because computer simulations are not able to reach the ground state of the system or cannot enforce a sufficiently large number of higher-order stability criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude that our results reproduce Efros and Shklovskii's law, although they are also compatible with a steeper DOS, as obtained in ref. [62]. We would like to remark that the 1/2 exponent was obtained by Pollak through a powerful scaling argument that does not rely on conductivity being due to single‐electron jumps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%