1985
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(85)91004-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coulomb form factors of collective E4 transitions in s-d shell nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may seem surprising that the effective C4 isoscalar charge (2.0e) is BROWN & WTLDENTHAL larger than the effective C2 isoscalar charge (1.6-1.8e). However, this larger value is consistent with a calculation for the coupling of the sd-shell valence orbits to the C4 giant resonance (126). It would be interesting to continue such comparisons for the higher-multipole (L > 4) longitudinal form factors in heavier nuclei.…”
Section: Higher-multipole Matrix Elements and Electron Scattering Forsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It may seem surprising that the effective C4 isoscalar charge (2.0e) is BROWN & WTLDENTHAL larger than the effective C2 isoscalar charge (1.6-1.8e). However, this larger value is consistent with a calculation for the coupling of the sd-shell valence orbits to the C4 giant resonance (126). It would be interesting to continue such comparisons for the higher-multipole (L > 4) longitudinal form factors in heavier nuclei.…”
Section: Higher-multipole Matrix Elements and Electron Scattering Forsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, for the 4 + 1 (K π = 0 + ) state, such reaction calculations with phenomenological collective models have failed to describe the angular distribution of the (p, p ) cross sections. Further, microscopic approaches have been applied to calculate the inelastic scattering of protons [14,27] and the inelastic charge form factors [9,36]; however, no microscopic calculation has succeeded in reproducing the property of the 0 + 1 → 4 + 1 transition. In inelastic scattering, the 4 + 1 (4.12 MeV) state is weakly produced compared to the 2 + 2 (4.24 MeV) state at close energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%