2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.80.044325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coulomb excitation of the proton-dripline nucleusNa20

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…renders the calculation relatively straightforward. Note that k|N k |k = sinh 2 (r k ), where N k is the number operator [21]. With this in mind, we find that (48) reduces to…”
Section: The Density Matrixmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…renders the calculation relatively straightforward. Note that k|N k |k = sinh 2 (r k ), where N k is the number operator [21]. With this in mind, we find that (48) reduces to…”
Section: The Density Matrixmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(48) is a relatively simple affair -due to the nature of the squeezed states, the expectation value operator v 2n , n ∈ Z must be diagonal in this (discrete) basis of states. This, along with the identities [21]:…”
Section: The Density Matrixmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These differences between the USD and USDA/B B(E2; 2 + i → 3 + ) strengths can be traced back by analyzing the shell-model configurations of the involved states. Shell-model calculations show that for the three different interactions the wave function of the 3 + state in 26 Na is dominated by a π (d 3 5/2 ) 5/2 + ⊗ ν(d 6 5/2 s 1 1/2 ) 1/2 + configuration. Configurations containing either an unpaired nucleon in the πs 1/2 orbital or in the νd 5/2 orbital are favored for the 2 + 1 state compared to the 2 + 2 state for the USDA and USDB interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception to this observation are the odd-odd nuclei, 30 P and 34 Cl, therefore a more complete comparison for odd-odd nuclei was suggested. A low-energy Coulomb excitation study of 20 Na provided experimental B(E2) and B(M1) strengths [6] cited to be inconsistent with the USDB calculations. However, different effective charges and effective g factors were used than the values suggested for the USDB interaction [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%