Coulomb dissociation as a source of information on radiative capture processes of astrophysical interest

Baur, G.; Bertulani, C. A.; Rebel, H.

doi:10.1016/0375-9474(86)90290-3

Cited by 422 publications

(354 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

342

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Performing such an experiment at carefully chosen kinematics to minimize nuclear-interaction effects and assuming the break-up as a one-step process in which a single virtual photon is absorbed, the Coulomb dissociation is the inverse of the radiative capture process [5].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Erratum:E2 contribution to thep8+7
Langanke¹,
Shoppa²
1995
Phys. Rev. C
21
1
7
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We have calculated the E1 and E2 contributions to the low-energy 8 B +208 Pb → p + 7 Be + 208 Pb Coulomb dissociation cross sections using the kinematics of a recent experiment at RIKEN. Using a potential model description of the 7 Be(p, γ) 8 B reaction, we find that the E2 contributions cannot a priori be ignored in the analysis of the data. Its inclusion reduces the extracted 7 Be(p, γ) 8 B S-factor at solar energies by about 25%.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Using the semi-classical formulas of Ref. [5], the Coulomb dissociation cross section was translated into S-factors for the 7 Be(p, γ) 8 B radiative capture process. From this it was concluded that the 7 Be(p, γ) 8 B Sfactor at solar energies is likely to be smaller than 20 eV-b, supporting the lower [4] of the two direct 7 Be(p, γ) 8 B measurements.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Erratum:E2 contribution to thep8+7
Langanke¹,
Shoppa²
1995
Phys. Rev. C
21
1
7
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This method was proposed in Ref. [307] and has been applied to several reactions of interest for astrophysics. For example, the reaction 7 Be(p, γ) 8 B relevant for the production of high-energy solar neutrinos has been studied with this method [308][309][310].…”

Section: Reaction Rates and Radiative Capturementioning

confidence: 99%

Current Status of Nuclear Physics Research

Bertulani

Hussein

2015

Braz J Phys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this review we discuss the current status of research in nuclear physics which is being carried out in different centers in the World. For this purpose we supply a short account of the development in the area which evolved over the last 9 decades, since the discovery of the neutron. The evolution of the physics of the atomic nucleus went through many stages as more data become available. We briefly discuss models introduced to discern the physics behind the experimental discoveries, such as the shell model, the collective model, the statistical model, the interacting boson model, etc., some of these models may be seemingly in conflict with each other, but this was shown to be only apparent.The richness of the ideas and abundance of theoretical models attests to the important fact that the nucleus is a really singular system in the sense that it evolves from two-body bound states such as the deuteron, to few-body bound states, such as 4 He, 7 Li, 9 Be etc. and up the ladder to heavier bound nuclei containing up to more than 200 nucleons. Clearly statistical mechanics, usually employed in systems with very large number of particles, would seemingly not work for such finite systems as the nuclei, neither do other theories which are applicable to condensed matter. The richness of nuclear physics stems from these restrictions. New theories and models are presently being developed. Theories of the structure and reactions of neutron-rich and proton-rich nuclei, called exotic nuclei, halo nuclei, or Borromean nuclei, deal with the wealth of experimental data that became available in the last 35 years. Further, nuclear astrophysics and stellar and Big Bang nucleosynthesis have become a more mature subject. Due to limited space, this review only covers a few selected topics, mainly those with which the authors have worked on. Our aimed potential readers of this review are nuclear physicists and physicists in other areas, as well as graduate students interested in pursuing a career in nuclear physics.

show abstract

“…The THM is a renowned indirect method, very useful in the study of reaction with charged particles in the exit channel, in contrast with ANC [23] and Coulomb dissociation [24], focused on radiative capture reactions. However, the 10 B(p,α 0 ) 7 Be cross section was measured in the energy range 0-100 keV [16], and the lack of a sufficient statistics did not allow us to extend the excitation function in the region 100 -1000 keV.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement of the B10(p,α0)Be7 cross section from 5 keV to 1.5 MeV

Spitaleri¹,

Puglia²,

Cognata³

et al. 2017

Phys. Rev. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coulomb dissociation as a source of information on radiative capture processes of astrophysical interest

Cited by 422 publications

References 17 publications

Erratum:E2 contribution to thep8+7
Langanke¹,
Shoppa²
1995
Phys. Rev. C
21
1
7
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Erratum:E2 contribution to thep8+7
Langanke¹,
Shoppa²
1995
Phys. Rev. C
21
1
7
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Current Status of Nuclear Physics Research

Measurement of the B10(p,α0)Be7 cross section from 5 keV to 1.5 MeV

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Coulomb dissociation as a source of information on radiative capture processes of astrophysical interest

Cited by 422 publications

References 17 publications

Erratum:E2 contribution to thep8+7Langanke1, Shoppa2 1995Phys. Rev. C21170View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Erratum:E2 contribution to thep8+7Langanke1, Shoppa2 1995Phys. Rev. C21170View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Current Status of Nuclear Physics Research

Measurement of the B10(p,α0)Be7 cross section from 5 keV to 1.5 MeV

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Erratum:E2 contribution to thep8+7
Langanke¹,
Shoppa²
1995
Phys. Rev. C
21
1
7
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Erratum:E2 contribution to thep8+7
Langanke¹,
Shoppa²
1995
Phys. Rev. C
21
1
7
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite