2015
DOI: 10.5958/2394-2754.2015.00018.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could Simple Procedures Minimize Hysterectomy in Management of Placenta Accreta?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[94,84] Some patients had more than one such procedure. Hospital [95] , but in our study, the success rate was 52.7%, The difference in result may be owing to applying multiple procedures like compression suture and sewing placental bed and local resection of placental implantation site Our study agreed with El Shazly et al and another study. (96,113,114,111) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…[94,84] Some patients had more than one such procedure. Hospital [95] , but in our study, the success rate was 52.7%, The difference in result may be owing to applying multiple procedures like compression suture and sewing placental bed and local resection of placental implantation site Our study agreed with El Shazly et al and another study. (96,113,114,111) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…15 In the present study uterine artery ligation was performed in 300 cases (60.73%). this is in agreement with many authors who advocate routine uterine artery ligation in PA. 16 Another study done at Tanta University Hospital which reported 100% success of double uterine artery ligation in management of PA. 17 Others reported no value for this ligation. 18 Mitwaly and his colleague tried a new method of combined surgical steps in management of PA. 19 It was successful in 18 out of 20 cases for conservation of the uterus with no postpartum hemorrhage or maternal mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Also there were some different results, such as the units of blood transfusion (2-7) units while in our study (2)(3)(4)(5) units. The operative time was (110±20) minutes, while in our study was (75-140) minutes and the mean hospital stay was (4.2±0.4) days, while in our study was (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) days. Comparing rates of associated complications, one patient had post-operative wound infection while in our study, 6 cases (12%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%