2016
DOI: 10.1177/0300060516664637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio be an indicator of coronary artery disease, coronary artery ectasia and coronary slow flow?

Abstract: ObjectiveTo determine whether neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) differed between patients with isolated coronary artery disease (CAD), isolated coronary artery ectasia (CAE), coronary slow flow and normal coronary anatomy.MethodsPatients who underwent coronary angiography were consecutively enrolled into one of four groups: CAD, coronary slow flow, CAE and normal coronary anatomy.ResultsThe CAD (n = 40), coronary slow flow (n = 40), and CAE (n = 40) groups had similar NLRs (2.51 ± 0.7, 2.40 ± 0.8, 2.6 ± 0.6, r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NLR may be an indicator of CAD, CAE and coronary slow ow. This nding suggests that a more severe in ammatory process could be involved in the development of CAE [26][27][28]. A more signi cant level of chronic in ammation might be linked with the pathogenesis of CAE, which is associated with not only in ammatory markers but also in ammatory cells in patients with CAE [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The NLR may be an indicator of CAD, CAE and coronary slow ow. This nding suggests that a more severe in ammatory process could be involved in the development of CAE [26][27][28]. A more signi cant level of chronic in ammation might be linked with the pathogenesis of CAE, which is associated with not only in ammatory markers but also in ammatory cells in patients with CAE [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Among 17 studies of 8,988 subjects, 4 studies [ 14 , 16 , 20 , 23 ] reported ORs of high versus low NLR, 8 studies [ 10 12 , 17 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 26 ] reported mean differences of NLR between CAD and non-CAD patients, and 5 studies [ 13 , 15 , 18 , 24 , 25 ] reported both.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen studies reported mean difference in NLR between CAD and non-CAD patients (see Table 3 ). Most study designs (9/13 studies) were cross-sectional; three were case-control [ 11 , 17 , 22 ] and one [ 18 ] was cohort. USMD was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.52, 1.22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NLR may be an indicator of CAD, CAE, and coronary slow flow. This finding suggests that a more severe inflammatory process could be involved in CAE development [ 33 35 ]. In our study, we also studied the NLR between the NC and total CAE groups; the NLR was higher in the total CAE group than in the NC group, indicating the tendency of severe inflammation in CAE, although the result was not statistically significant ( P = 0.1025).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%