2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12281-020-00373-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could Fungicides Lead to Azole Drug Resistance in a Cross-Resistance Manner among Environmental Cryptococcus Strains?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basidiomycete yeasts are generally much less, or not at all, sensitive to azoles as well as to 5-FC and the agricultural azoles difenoconazole and epoxiconazole, and even to cyproconazole (Drummond et al, 2007;Takahashi et al, 2020), a fungicide known to be especially effective against basidiomycete plant pathogens. Therefore, agricultural azoles are considered as being too weak for Cryptococcus control and resistance selection under agricultural conditions, also because applied field rates and potential residue concentrations in soil are way too low for selecting resistance (Gisi, 2014).…”
Section: Clinically Relevant Yeast Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Basidiomycete yeasts are generally much less, or not at all, sensitive to azoles as well as to 5-FC and the agricultural azoles difenoconazole and epoxiconazole, and even to cyproconazole (Drummond et al, 2007;Takahashi et al, 2020), a fungicide known to be especially effective against basidiomycete plant pathogens. Therefore, agricultural azoles are considered as being too weak for Cryptococcus control and resistance selection under agricultural conditions, also because applied field rates and potential residue concentrations in soil are way too low for selecting resistance (Gisi, 2014).…”
Section: Clinically Relevant Yeast Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, agricultural azoles are considered as being too weak for Cryptococcus control and resistance selection under agricultural conditions, also because applied field rates and potential residue concentrations in soil are way too low for selecting resistance (Gisi, 2014). In fact, Takahashi et al (2020) stated that "up to now, no data exist on resistance to triazoles among Cryptococcus environmental isolates from cultivated agricultural areas under fungicide pressure". Most isolates of T. asahii are up to 100-fold less sensitive than those of C. albicans and are considered as intrinsically resistant to all medical antifungals (Figure 2).…”
Section: Clinically Relevant Yeast Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated azole resistance patterns are shown in Table 1 . The chemical structures of the triazoles used in agriculture and medicine are often similar ( Figure S1 ), so the occurrence of comparable mechanisms of resistance among crop and medically important pathogens is not surprising [ 117 ]. According to the risk assessment of the European center for disease control and prevention (ECDC), the most used triazoles in agriculture are prothioconazole, TBC and EPC in the United Kingdom, Denmark, and the Netherlands.…”
Section: Azole Resistance In Fungal Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing use of fungicides in agriculture may decrease Cryptococcus susceptibility to azoles, thus resulting in resistant strains 103 …”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…101,102 The increasing use of fungicides in agriculture may decrease Cryptococcus susceptibility to azoles, thus resulting in resistant strains. 103 Echinocandins have no activity against Cryptococcus spp. ; however, the mechanism is not well understood as in vitro studies have shown that the (1,3) β-glucan synthase activity of this organism is quite sensitive to echinocandins.…”
Section: Surgical Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%