2002
DOI: 10.1029/2001pa000678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could changing ocean circulation have destabilized methane hydrate at the Paleocene/Eocene boundary?

Abstract: [1] During the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM, $55 Ma), marine and terrestrial carbon isotope values exhibit a negative shift of at least 2.5%, indicative of massive destabilization of marine methane hydrates, releasing $2000 gigatons of methane carbon. The cause of the hydrate destabilization is unknown but has been speculated to be warming due to a change from high-latitude to low-latitude deepwater formation. Here we present results from a numerical ocean model indicating that a sudden switch of dee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
108
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
10
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet it is difficult to sustain a succession of such events through a positive feedback effect: it takes a millennium or more for the atmospheric warming from each methane pulse to return to deep ocean waters where it can mobilize the hydrates buried beneath the seabed [6][7][8] , far longer than the atmospheric residence time of the original methane. For seabed hydrates to be able to trigger the PETM, the initial catastrophic sediment slides must have been forced to recur much more rapidly, at intervals of about a decade, and this period of forced repetition must have been sustained over perhaps a millennium, until additional methane from mobilized hydrate could maintain the new warm climate 9 (see Supplementary Information).…”
Section: Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet it is difficult to sustain a succession of such events through a positive feedback effect: it takes a millennium or more for the atmospheric warming from each methane pulse to return to deep ocean waters where it can mobilize the hydrates buried beneath the seabed [6][7][8] , far longer than the atmospheric residence time of the original methane. For seabed hydrates to be able to trigger the PETM, the initial catastrophic sediment slides must have been forced to recur much more rapidly, at intervals of about a decade, and this period of forced repetition must have been sustained over perhaps a millennium, until additional methane from mobilized hydrate could maintain the new warm climate 9 (see Supplementary Information).…”
Section: Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regional context for Marlborough indicates that relatively minor climatic cooling may have enhanced coastal upwelling of cool southern sourced deep water through intensification of westerly winds and cyclonic circulation (Haq 1981;Huber & Sloan 2001;Bice & Marotzke 2002). It appears that phase 3 represents an interval of c. 450 000 yr in which the climate around New Zealand became progressively cooler.…”
Section: Comparison Between Flaxbourne River and Woodside Creekmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the PETM, reduced pole-to-equator sea surface temperature gradients or changes in continental freshwater runoff may have shifted the site of deep-water formation from a Southern Ocean locus to subtropical latitudes or to high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere [e.g., Kennett and Stott, 1991;Bice and Marotzke, 2002;Nunes and Norris, 2006], introducing warm water to the deep sea and driving methane clathrate destabilization and further greenhouse warming [Bice and Marotzke, 2002].…”
Section: Hydrospherementioning
confidence: 99%