2024
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad12b7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could a Kilonova Kill: A Threat Assessment

Haille M. L. Perkins,
John Ellis,
Brian D. Fields
et al.

Abstract: Binary neutron star mergers produce high-energy emissions from several physically different sources, including a gamma-ray burst (GRB) and its afterglow, a kilonova (KN), and, at late times, a remnant many parsecs in size. Ionizing radiation from these sources can be dangerous for life on Earth-like planets when located too close. Work to date has explored the substantial danger posed by the GRB to on-axis observers; here we focus instead on the potential threats posed to nearby off-axis observers. Our analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are roughly comparable with the Local Bubble radius. Crucially, they are sufficiently distant from the Earth to avoid life extinction (D rad  10 pc; see, e.g., Perkins et al 2024) but not too distant for the kilonova remnant to dissolve before reaching the Earth (i.e., D rad  R fade ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are roughly comparable with the Local Bubble radius. Crucially, they are sufficiently distant from the Earth to avoid life extinction (D rad  10 pc; see, e.g., Perkins et al 2024) but not too distant for the kilonova remnant to dissolve before reaching the Earth (i.e., D rad  R fade ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our models disfavor viewing angles very close to the poles, the relativistic jet that could have originated from such an event would not have hit the Earth due to its small opening angle (θ jet  6°; see, e.g., Fong et al 2015;Perkins et al 2024).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%