2006
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[246:cpdavi]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cougar Population Dynamics and Viability in the Pacific Northwest

Abstract: Increasing reports of human/cougar conflicts may suggest that cougars are increasing in the Pacific Northwest. We determined minimum relative densities and average fecundity, survival, and growth rate of an apparently increasing cougar population in northeastern Washington, USA; northern Idaho, USA; and southern British Columbia, Canada, from 1998 to 2003. Minimum relative densities declined from 1.47 cougars/100 km2to 0.85 cougars/100 km2. We estimated average litter size at 2.53 kittens, interbirth interval … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
123
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
123
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results provide strong evidence of reproductive senescence (manifested as a lower probability of reproduction) in older Florida panthers, but suggest that age-specific differences in reproduction prior to senescence are minor. The overall average litter size was 2.60 ± 0.09; this estimate, although slightly higher than previous estimates for Florida panthers (Lotz et al 2005: 2.4;Maehr and Caddick 1995: 2.25), is within the range of litter size estimates reported for western populations of pumas (1.7-3.0; Cooley et al 2009;Lambert et al 2006;Laundré et al 2007;Logan and Sweanor 2001;Robinson et al 2008;Stoner et al 2006). Sub-adult females produced somewhat larger litters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Our results provide strong evidence of reproductive senescence (manifested as a lower probability of reproduction) in older Florida panthers, but suggest that age-specific differences in reproduction prior to senescence are minor. The overall average litter size was 2.60 ± 0.09; this estimate, although slightly higher than previous estimates for Florida panthers (Lotz et al 2005: 2.4;Maehr and Caddick 1995: 2.25), is within the range of litter size estimates reported for western populations of pumas (1.7-3.0; Cooley et al 2009;Lambert et al 2006;Laundré et al 2007;Logan and Sweanor 2001;Robinson et al 2008;Stoner et al 2006). Sub-adult females produced somewhat larger litters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…To determine intervals when survival probabilities were constant, we analyzed the statistical distribution of deaths over a 365-day period (Lambert et al 2006). This yielded two mortality seasons: a high-mortality season (LH: 1 August to 31 December, HH: 1 October to 31 January) and a low-mortality season (LH: 1 January to 31 July, HH: 2 February to September 31).…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers (Lambert et al 2006) modified the standard mean litter size/mean birth interval ratio by estimating percentage of unproductive females (those with litters of zero and indeterminate birth intervals) and multiplying the reciprocal of this percentage by the standard ratio estimate. Others (Chapron et al 2003;McLoughlin et al 2003b;Wielgus et al 2001) estimated Mx using a probabilistic approach-which incorporates the probabilities of producing from 0 to N offspring on an annual basis.…”
Section: Communicated By M Artoismentioning
confidence: 99%