2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cotton pests classification in field-based images using deep residual networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These proves the possibility for multispectral images to detect waterlogging stress of cotton. RGB images are common materials for classification with deep learning [38][39][40] . This paper proved that hyperspectral images of cotton leaves with different waterlogging stress could be classified with CNN models.…”
Section: Detection Of Waterlogging Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These proves the possibility for multispectral images to detect waterlogging stress of cotton. RGB images are common materials for classification with deep learning [38][39][40] . This paper proved that hyperspectral images of cotton leaves with different waterlogging stress could be classified with CNN models.…”
Section: Detection Of Waterlogging Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above studies all use unsupervised clustering and threshold segmentation methods. [15] presents a diseases detection method of cotton leaf spot using the SVM classifier. However, due to the complex background of crop image data and small differences in some details, sometimes such methods are difficult to obtain good results.…”
Section: A Image Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, to prevent overfitting in the training depth separable convolution model, Kamal et al (2019) [16] use image rotation, flipping and shifts enhance the data. Alves et al (2020) [17] enhance the data on the premise of only 100 pieces of data for each category in the data set, increase the original 1600 pictures to 11,520, and improve the accuracy of their ResNet34* model to 98.1%.…”
Section: A Image Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their experimental results showed that the deep CNN model performed much better than other approaches. Alves et al [22] adopted deep residual networks to identify cotton pests. They provided a field-based image dataset containing 1600 images of 15 pests.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%