2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04796-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cotton Genomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For many crops, the generation of stable transgenic plants is largely limited to a few genetic backgrounds. In cotton transformation, a persistent challenge has been the genotype specificity of cotton somatic embryogenesis, which is the most efficient transformation method (Trolinder, 2009; Paterson, 2010). Cotton transformation is limited to highly embryogenic cultivars, such as Coker 312 and Coker 5110 (Trolinder, 2009; Paterson, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For many crops, the generation of stable transgenic plants is largely limited to a few genetic backgrounds. In cotton transformation, a persistent challenge has been the genotype specificity of cotton somatic embryogenesis, which is the most efficient transformation method (Trolinder, 2009; Paterson, 2010). Cotton transformation is limited to highly embryogenic cultivars, such as Coker 312 and Coker 5110 (Trolinder, 2009; Paterson, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cotton transformation, a persistent challenge has been the genotype specificity of cotton somatic embryogenesis, which is the most efficient transformation method (Trolinder, 2009; Paterson, 2010). Cotton transformation is limited to highly embryogenic cultivars, such as Coker 312 and Coker 5110 (Trolinder, 2009; Paterson, 2010). For utilization of VIGS as a tool for cotton gene function studies and functional genomics, the ability to silence genes readily in various genotypes is desirable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation