2000
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-00-02475-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cotorsion theories and splitters

Abstract: Abstract. Let R be a subring of the rationals. We want to investigate self splitting R-modules G (that is Ext R (G, G) = 0). Following Schultz, we call such modules splitters. Free modules and torsion-free cotorsion modules are classical examples of splitters. Are there others? Answering an open problem posed by Schultz, we will show that there are more splitters, in fact we are able to prescribe their endomorphism R-algebras with a free R-module structure. As a by-product we are able to solve a problem of Sal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One fundamental result on completeness of cotorsion pairs is due to Eklof and Trlifaj, they proved that any cotorsion pair cogenerated by a set of modules is complete [5], which is a generalization of the corresponding result of Göbel and Shelah on abelian groups in [7]. Hovey extended this result to Grothendieck categories [12], and later, Saorín and Šť ovíček generalized it further to their efficient exact categories [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…One fundamental result on completeness of cotorsion pairs is due to Eklof and Trlifaj, they proved that any cotorsion pair cogenerated by a set of modules is complete [5], which is a generalization of the corresponding result of Göbel and Shelah on abelian groups in [7]. Hovey extended this result to Grothendieck categories [12], and later, Saorín and Šť ovíček generalized it further to their efficient exact categories [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We introduced these groups in [20], pointing out the obvious facts that free groups and cotorsion groups are splitters, and posed the question whether these classes are the only examples. This question was answered immediately in the negative by Göbel and Shelah [13], who by an elaborate construction using generators and relations found large classes of counterexamples.…”
Section: The Functor Ext(− G)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An arbitrary group L is cotorsion-free if all its abelian subgroups are cotorsion-free. Other splitters have only recently been constructed (see [10,11]). They were also fundamental for solving the flat cover conjecture for modules.…”
Section: Definition 1•2mentioning
confidence: 99%