COSY-SCL, the superconducting injector linac for COSY

Toelle, R.; Bechstedt, U.; Bongers, N.; Dietrich, J.; Eichhorn, Ralf; Esser, Frank; Felden, O.; Gebel, R.; Henn, K.; Jungwirth, H.; Lehrach, A.; Maier, R.; Pfister, U.; Prasuhn, D.; Rossen, P. von; Schnase, A.; Schneider, H.; Senichev, Y.; Stassen, R.; Stockhorst, H.; Zaplatin, E.; Schempp, A.

doi:10.1109/pac.2003.1288986

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Using modern calculation platforms it is possible to substitute practical values in order to observe Hamiltonian transformation. For instance, the above described Hamiltonian was calculated in MathCAD® for the COSY-Injector accelerating channel [3] with 17mA average current and 10% mismatch (see Fig. 1).…”

Section: Computational Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Transverse Nonlinear Tune Shift as Stabilizing Factor in Halo Creation in Space Charge Dominated Beam

Vasyukhin

Senichev²,

Tölle³

Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the most important problems for space charge dominated beams in the low energy part of superconducting linacs is halo creation. Many authors show one of the key effects in halo creatiation is parametric resonance due to the mismatched betafunction oscillation (between core and particle). To estimate parametric resonance conditions the nonlinear tune shift for binomial distributed beam is described theoretically in this article. Simultaneously the beam dynamics simulation 3D PIC code was developed. The transverse oscillation frequencies are compared with parametric resonance criteria. As a result the recommendation for space charge shift is concluded to minimize halo creation.

show abstract

Section: Computational Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Transverse Nonlinear Tune Shift as Stabilizing Factor in Halo Creation in Space Charge Dominated Beam

Vasyukhin

Senichev²,

Tölle³

Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As an example for the first option of a superconducting accelerator the design of an injector-linear accelerator for COSY ring was taken [1]. The focusing period consists of four super-conducting half-wave cavities [2] in one cryo-module and an external quadrupole doublet.…”

Section: Eight Accelerating Gaps Per Focusing Periodmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Beam Dynamic in Different Superconducting Options of Low Energy High Intense Linac

Vasyukhin

Senichev²,

Tölle³

Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At present the superconducting proton linacs have obvious applications in energy range ~100-1000 MeV. For the lower energy <100 MeV the comprehensive investigations are required. In this article the various variants of superconducting options from 3MeV up to 40-100MeV are discussed. The considered variants include both the conventional combination of half-wave and spoke cavity with quadrupoles and new schemes. In conclusion major parameters for different structures are discussed. AbstractAt present the superconducting proton linacs have obvious applications in energy range ~100-1000 MeV. For the lower energy <100 MeV the comprehensive investigations are required. In this article the various variants of superconducting options from 3MeV up to 40-100MeV are discussed. The considered variants include both the conventional combination of half-wave and spoke cavity with quadrupoles and new schemes. In conclusion major parameters for different structures are discussed.

show abstract