2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2303.13480
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosupport in tensor triangular geometry

Abstract: We develop a theory of cosupport and costratification in tensor triangular geometry. We study the geometric relationship between support and cosupport, provide a conceptual foundation for cosupport as categorically dual to support, and discover surprising relations between the theory of costratification and the theory of stratification. We prove that many categories in algebra, topology and geometry are costratified by developing and applying descent techniques. An overarching theme is that cosupport is releva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an open question whether the converse to Theorem 1.3 holds, that is, whether the surjectivity of ϕ in (1.4) implies that the family {f * i } i∈I is jointly nil-conservative. It is known that the family need not be jointly conservative (see [BCHS23,Example 14.26]). In light of Theorem 1.8, the converse of Theorem 1.3 would follow from Balmer's "Nerves of Steel" Conjecture that the homological and tensor triangular spectra always coincide; see [BHS21a].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is an open question whether the converse to Theorem 1.3 holds, that is, whether the surjectivity of ϕ in (1.4) implies that the family {f * i } i∈I is jointly nil-conservative. It is known that the family need not be jointly conservative (see [BCHS23,Example 14.26]). In light of Theorem 1.8, the converse of Theorem 1.3 would follow from Balmer's "Nerves of Steel" Conjecture that the homological and tensor triangular spectra always coincide; see [BHS21a].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark. Using the Balmer-Favi support [BF11] and the techniques of [BCHS23], it is possible to prove Theorem 1.3 for arbitrary indexing sets I under the additional hypothesis that Spc(T c ) is weakly noetherian. However, since the construction of a surjective map as in (1.4) is often the first step in understanding Spc(T c ), making any assumption on its topology is not desirable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%