2015
DOI: 10.1002/hec.3260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs and Quality at the Hospital Level in the Nordic Countries

Abstract: This article develops and analyzes patient register-based measures of quality for the major Nordic countries. Previous studies show that Finnish hospitals have significantly higher average productivity than hospitals in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway and also a substantial variation within each country. This paper examines whether quality differences can form part of the explanation and attempts to uncover quality-cost trade-offs.Data on costs and discharges in each diagnosis-related group for 160 acute hospitals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
28
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recent studies have incorporated quality indices as an output measure or otherwise controlled for quality [23]. In this paper we have measured only the hospital production by volume based on average costs, not the contents of that production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some recent studies have incorporated quality indices as an output measure or otherwise controlled for quality [23]. In this paper we have measured only the hospital production by volume based on average costs, not the contents of that production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has been used at different levels: comparing nations [20], regions [21] but more commonly hospitals. In Norway and the Nordic countries there are numerous examples of DEA used for estimating hospital productivity [9,11,17,[22][23][24][25][26][27]. The method is favoured in environments where substantial measurement errors are unlikely and with multiple inputs and/or outputs [7,28,29].…”
Section: Methods: Estimating Productivity and Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 It should be mentioned that the Italian data were not nationally representative and covered relatively wealthy Italian regions. In Kittelsen et al (2015), hospitals were the spatial units of analysis. The regions were bigger for VLBW and VLGA infants (e.g.…”
Section: Literature On Geographic Variation In Health Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five specific diseases (acute myocardial infarction (AMI), breast cancer, hip fracture, stroke and infants born with very low birth weight (VLBW) and/or very low gestational age (VLGA) (further referred to as VLBW/VLGA infants) were selected to serve as case studies and for which countrywide patient data were collected in the participating countries (Finland, Hungary, Italy, 1 the Netherlands, Norway, Scotland and Sweden) Hagen et al, 2015aHagen et al, , 2015bMalmivaara et al, 2015;Medin et al, 2015;Numerato et al, 2015;Peltola et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2015). In addition, one study was carried out with the hospital as unit of analysis and including all diseases treated in the hospital (Kittelsen et al, 2015). For this analysis, hospital patient data from the Nordic countries only were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australia was one of the first countries that followed the USA paradigm, and adapted its own specific AR-DRG classification based upon 23 major diagnostic categories (MDC) [16]. Nordic countries [17] (Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark) introduced the Nordic DRGs (Nord DRGs) based on a refined DRG from Health Care Financing Administration (HFA-DRGs) [18], Estonia [19], has introduced and gradually implemented (50% of case cost) the Nord DRGs since 2003. Iceland [14] has been using the Nord DRGs on a trial basis in Landspitali University Hospital since 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%