1984
DOI: 10.1136/adc.59.11.1064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs and outcomes in a regional neonatal intensive care unit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over 7.2 per cent of all babies born in 1986 were of low birthweight. A study from Birmingham, England, shows that the smaller the baby the higher is the cost of special or intensive care, which ranged from an average of £2,500 per baby weighing over 1,500 g to £10,000 per baby weighing under 1,000 g, with an average cost of around £5,500 per baby (Newns et al, 1984). Costs in some centres are somewhat lower and vary with management policy (Sandhu et al, 1986).…”
Section: The Size Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Over 7.2 per cent of all babies born in 1986 were of low birthweight. A study from Birmingham, England, shows that the smaller the baby the higher is the cost of special or intensive care, which ranged from an average of £2,500 per baby weighing over 1,500 g to £10,000 per baby weighing under 1,000 g, with an average cost of around £5,500 per baby (Newns et al, 1984). Costs in some centres are somewhat lower and vary with management policy (Sandhu et al, 1986).…”
Section: The Size Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The cost per survivor would be reduced by up to 16% even if the drug cost were to be as high as £550/baby. If the policies were to be adopted only for babies under 31 weeks' gestation, both policies would result in a reduction in cost of between 5 and 16%/survivor, although the increased survival resulting from the policies would lead to an increase in overall costs for babies of less then 31 weeks' gestation of between 7 Although neonatal intensive care is more cost effective than many other widely accepted components of health care,' it is one of the most costly parts of the perinatal health services. The costs of caring for babies who require artificial ventilation are particularly high,3 '3 and a high proportion of these babies have respiratory distress syndrome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narang et al found the total admission cost for preterm infants less than 1000g was 4 times more than those weighing 1250g-1500g (17). The cost of neonatal care for infants below 1000 g was found to be 75% higher compared to those between 1000g to 1499g and more than four times higher than those weighing 1500g and more (3, 21). These findings relate to this study where the total cost of intensive care per infant for extreme preterm (mean birth weight 0.92kg) was more than one and a half times higher than very preterm group (mean birth weight 1.26kg), two and a half times higher than moderate preterm (mean birth weight 1.69kg) and five times higher than late preterm (mean birth weight 2.08kg).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Narang et al found the total admission cost for preterm infants less than 1000g was 4 times more than those weighing 1250g-1500g (17). Cost of neonatal care for infants below 1000 g was found to be 75% higher compared to those between 1000g to 1499g and more than four times higher than those weighing 1500g and more (3, 21). In summary increasing prematurity either by gestational age or birth weight is associated with exponential increase in hospital cost (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%