2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122x.2006.00206.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs and Health Effects of Breast Cancer Interventions in Epidemiologically Different Regions of Africa, North America, and Asia

Abstract: We estimated the costs and health effects of treating stage I, II, III, and IV breast cancer individually, of treating all stages, and of introducing an extensive cancer control program (treating all stages plus early stage diagnosis) in three epidemiologically different world regions--Africa, North America, and Asia. We developed a mathematical simulation model of breast cancer using the stage distribution and case fatality rates in the presence and absence of treatment as predictors of survival. Outcome meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
105
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In Africa and Asia the treatment of breast cancer in stages I, II or III costs less than U$ 390 per Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY) averted. If the cancer progresses to stage IV treatment will cost more than 3,500U$ per DALY averted (Groot et al, 2006). Breast cancer treatment in India varies from non existent, to the most updated at power with the developed world.…”
Section: Detection Diagnosis and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Africa and Asia the treatment of breast cancer in stages I, II or III costs less than U$ 390 per Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY) averted. If the cancer progresses to stage IV treatment will cost more than 3,500U$ per DALY averted (Groot et al, 2006). Breast cancer treatment in India varies from non existent, to the most updated at power with the developed world.…”
Section: Detection Diagnosis and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, two meta-analyses including 10 new randomized trials show that the risk of acute myocardial infarction is 30 to 80% higher among patients with diabetes taking rosiglitazone than among those receiving placebo. 3,4 In comparisons of rosiglitazone with other antidiabetic agents, such as the sulfonylureas or metformin, the hazard ratio is lower, although it is still greater than 1. In comparison with the FDA's 2007 meta-analysis, the newer analyses showed higher odds ratios for major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, and serious ischemic events in patients receiving rosiglitazone (see Table 1).…”
Section: Revisiting the Rosiglitazone Story -Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management of late-stage breast cancer is more expensive, technically demanding, and results in more morbidity and mortality (M&M) than that of early-stage breast cancer (3,(5)(6)(7)(8). This is true even in high-income countries (HIC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%