Costs and expected gain in lifetime health from intensive care versus general ward care of 30,712 individual patients: a distribution-weighted cost-effectiveness analysis

Abstract

BackgroundClinicians, hospital managers, policy makers, and researchers are concerned about high costs, increased demand, and variation in priorities in the intensive care unit (ICU). The objectives of this modelling study are to describe the extra costs and expected health gains associated with admission to the ICU versus the general ward for 30,712 patients and the variation in cost-effectiveness estimates among subgroups and individuals, and to perform a distribution-weighted economic evaluation incorporating extra weighting to patients with high severity of disease.MethodsWe used a decision-analytic model that estimates the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (ICER) from ICU admission compared with general ward care using Norwegian registry data from 2008 to 2010. We assigned increasing weights to health gains for those with higher severity of disease, defined as less expected lifetime health if not admitted. The study has inherent uncertainty of findings because a randomized clinical trial comparing patients admitted or rejected to the ICU has never been performed. Uncertainty is explored in probabilistic sensitivity analysis.ResultsThe mean cost-effectiveness of ICU admission versus ward care was €11,600/QALY, with 1.6 QALYs gained and an incremental cost of €18,700 per patient. The probability (p) of cost-effectiveness was 95% at a threshold of €22,000/QALY. The mean ICER for medical admissions was €10,700/QALY (p = 97%), €12,300/QALY (p = 93%) for admissions after acute surgery, and €14,700/QALY (p = 84%) after planned surgery. For individualized ICERs, there was a 50% probability that ICU admission was cost-effective for 85% of the patients at a threshold of €64,000/QALY, leaving 15% of the admissions not cost-effective. In the distributional evaluation, 8% of all patients had distribution-weighted ICERs (higher weights to gains for more severe conditions) above €64,000/QALY. High-severity admissions gained the most, and were more cost-effective.ConclusionsOn average, ICU admission versus general ward care was cost-effective at a threshold of €22,000/QALY (p = 95%). According to the individualized cost-effectiveness information, one in six ICU admissions was not cost-effective at a threshold of €64,000/QALY. Almost half of these admissions that were not cost-effective can be regarded as acceptable when weighted by severity of disease in terms of expected lifetime health. Overall, existing ICU services represent reasonable resource use, but considerable uncertainty becomes evident when disaggregating into individualized results.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1792-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Association of Standardized Tracheostomy Care Protocol Implementation and Reinforcement With the Prevention of Life-Threatening Respiratory Events

“…A transfer of care to the ICU directly indicates patient compromise with a higher rate of increased complications in these units. 25 Our results indicate that the there was clinically meaningful increase in time spent in the ICU or ISCU in both the preprotocol and postprotocol group for rapid-response calls. Therefore, the suctioning policy, which may reduce the occurrence of rapid-response calls, may indirectly reduce the times spent in these higher level of care units by preventing readmissions to these unit from the floor.…”

Program on high value cost-conscious education in Intensive Care: Educational program on prediction of outcome and cost awareness on Intensive Care admission

“…Health care costs are rising every year due to a growing elderly population, health care innovation and new treatment possibilities. 1 Intensive Care (ICU) offers opportunities for extended and long-lasting support of vital functions and organs. However, this sort of care is expensive and does not automatically result in positive outcomes.…”

Program on high value cost-conscious education in Intensive Care:Educational program on prediction of outcome and cost awareness on Intensive Care admission

“…5 However, not all ICU care results automatically in favorable outcomes. 6,7 Careful decisions on the use of critical care can only be made when physicians are fully acquainted with the potential clinical outcomes as well as the costs of ICU care. However, the level of awareness regarding the costs of common prescription drugs (especially high cost medication), and commonly used materials in the ICU is often lacking, as described by Hernu et al 8 Moreover, ICU physicians generally overestimate the long-term survival and quality of life of ICU survivors.…”