2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs, and cost-outcome of school feeding programmes and feeding programmes for young children. Evidence and recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…India's midday meal scheme is thought to be one of the least expensive in the world. By our estimates, discussed earlier, the cost of midday meal provision is US$ 10 per child per year; Kristjansson et al (2016) independently comes to the same estimate. This means that the cost of providing midday meals for the full 5 years of primary school amounts to US$50 per child.…”
Section: Reading Scoresupporting
confidence: 52%
“…India's midday meal scheme is thought to be one of the least expensive in the world. By our estimates, discussed earlier, the cost of midday meal provision is US$ 10 per child per year; Kristjansson et al (2016) independently comes to the same estimate. This means that the cost of providing midday meals for the full 5 years of primary school amounts to US$50 per child.…”
Section: Reading Scoresupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Our finding of no significant change in the prevalence of stunting was in agreement with those from previous studies conducted in South Africa (46) , Brazil (47) and Palestine (48) , as well as a meta-analysis (49) finding that food distribution programmes had little or no effect on improving height-for-age over similar time frames.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…SFPs are transfer programmes that are intended to curb the burdens of hunger, malnutrition and ill‐health on school‐age children. The programme is often implemented by the World Food Program in partnership with governments and is proven to increase school enrolment, school attendance and learning (Kristjansson et al ., ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%