2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs and Consequences of Eliminating a Routine, Point-Of-Care HIV Screening Program in a High-Prevalence Jail

Abstract: Introduction: This study aims to assess the public health impact of eliminating a longstanding routine HIV screening program and replacing it with targeted testing. In addition, costs, outcomes, and cost effectiveness of routine screening are compared with those of targeted testing in the Fulton County Jail,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 40 43 CDC has developed guidance for developing HIV screening programs in correctional settings. 44 In this issue, Hutchinson and colleagues 45 provide an example of the impact of a jail screening program and not being able to maintain routine HIV screening in a jail in an EHE Phase 1 jurisdiction.…”
Section: Strategy 1: Expand or Implement Routine Opt-out Hiv Screenin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 40 43 CDC has developed guidance for developing HIV screening programs in correctional settings. 44 In this issue, Hutchinson and colleagues 45 provide an example of the impact of a jail screening program and not being able to maintain routine HIV screening in a jail in an EHE Phase 1 jurisdiction.…”
Section: Strategy 1: Expand or Implement Routine Opt-out Hiv Screenin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, models have shown HIV testing and treatment in prison, jails, or on release is cost-effective in preventing HIV transmission the United States. [21][22][23][24]…”
Section: Modeling Health Interventions In Criminal Justice Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With few exceptions, there is a paucity of recent literature exploring HIV testing efforts in detention settings. One notable exception is a study by Hutchinson et al (2021) that examined the cost effectiveness and public health impact of eliminating routine HIV screening as compared with targeted HIV testing in jails [ 36 ]. Results from this study suggest that routine screening identified 74 more new HIV infections over 1 year as compared to targeted HIV testing, resulting in roughly 10 averted HIV transmissions and 45 quality-adjusted life-years saved.…”
Section: Hiv Care Outcomes For Adults Released From Detention Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%