2012
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs and Benefits of Personalized Healthcare for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure in the Care and Education Program “Telemedicine for the Heart”

Abstract: The findings suggest that, besides a reduction of costs, by participating in "Telemedicine for the Heart" patients with chronic heart failure experienced a reduced number of hospital stays, optimized medical therapy, better quality of life, and reduced mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2012, a matched-pair analysis (essentially a case-control study) of 281 program participants receiving an intervention consisting of a decreasing intensity of nurse-supervised telephone calls were compared with a control group of 843 cases (a ratio of 1:3) matched on demographics and morbidity status. 165 In the intervention group, patients were encouraged to perform self-measurements (blood pressure, pulse, weight) via portable devices, and they received a mobile phone to transmit the data to the clinic if a telephone was not already available in the household. Monetized cost data for the two groups (including medication, hospitalization, therapeutic aids, total treatment, and mortality) were compared over a 1-year period.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2012, a matched-pair analysis (essentially a case-control study) of 281 program participants receiving an intervention consisting of a decreasing intensity of nurse-supervised telephone calls were compared with a control group of 843 cases (a ratio of 1:3) matched on demographics and morbidity status. 165 In the intervention group, patients were encouraged to perform self-measurements (blood pressure, pulse, weight) via portable devices, and they received a mobile phone to transmit the data to the clinic if a telephone was not already available in the household. Monetized cost data for the two groups (including medication, hospitalization, therapeutic aids, total treatment, and mortality) were compared over a 1-year period.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the retrospective, matched-pairs study "Telemedicine for the Heart", besides a reduction of costs, patients with chronic HF and telemedicine support experienced a reduced number of hospital stays, optimized medical therapy, better quality of life, and reduced mortality [42]. Remote patient monitoring, when utilized in conjunction with a robust management protocol, was not found to significantly differ from live nursing visits in the management of HF in home care [43].…”
Section: Telemedicine For Rehabilitation and Chronic Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Palmas et al (2010) suggested that healthcare costs did not decrease Medicare costs in underserved populations with diabetes (Palmas et al, 2010). For persons with the most severe cases of heart failure, the study demonstrated that there were statistically insignificant cost disadvantages for the intervention group due to increases in hospital related cost (Sohn et al, 2012). From the provider perspective, Takahashi et al (2010) suggested that the remote monitoring group had an estimated cost of $14,678 per person and the control group was $10,161 per person, not justifying the use of remote monitoring to decrease cost.…”
Section: Cost and Rawlsmentioning
confidence: 96%