2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2008.00656.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costly sexual harassment in a beetle

Abstract: The optimal number of mating partners for females rarely coincides with\ud that for males, leading to sexual conflict over mating frequency. In the bruchid beetle\ud Callosobruchus maculatus , the fitness consequences to females of engaging in\ud multiple copulations are complex, with studies demonstrating both costs and benefits\ud to multiple mating. However, females kept continuously with males have a lower\ud lifetime egg production compared with females mated only once and then isolated\ud from males. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The longevity and fecundity reduction of mated females due to the presence of males has been widely reported in insects including the seed bug, Lygaeus equestris [47] and Callosobruchus seed beetles [14], [18], [48], [49], although co-habitating with males did not always affect longevity and fecundity at the same time [43], [50], [51]. In our case, extremely low re-mating frequency was found during the majority of the female lifetime and the post-mating interactions were mainly male harassment and female resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longevity and fecundity reduction of mated females due to the presence of males has been widely reported in insects including the seed bug, Lygaeus equestris [47] and Callosobruchus seed beetles [14], [18], [48], [49], although co-habitating with males did not always affect longevity and fecundity at the same time [43], [50], [51]. In our case, extremely low re-mating frequency was found during the majority of the female lifetime and the post-mating interactions were mainly male harassment and female resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other Callosobruchus species, females had a reduced fecundity when co-habiting with males (Ronn et al 2006). In C. maculatus , females held with males had lower lifetime reproductive rates than females held alone (den Hollander and Gwynne 2009), and male harassment led to a reduction in fecundity (Gay et al 2009). In the leafcutting bee Megachili rotundata male harassment decreased female foraging behavior and fecundity (Rossi et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, contact with males was brief: in the SS+ treatment, we removed the two unsuccessful males as soon as the female began to mate with the third male, and copulations typically occurred within seconds or minutes of introducing the males and females. Thus, females in the SS+ treatment had scarcely more contact with males than did SS− females, so the amount of male harassment (see, e.g., Gay et al ., ; den Hollander & Gwynne, ) they experienced was presumably similar. Another possibility is that males that are particularly successful at attaining a mating under competitive conditions also tend to induce more copulation‐induced harm (although there seems to be no evidence for this; Ronn & Hotzy, ), or provide smaller nuptial gifts in their seminal fluid (although we detected no difference in copulation duration, which counts against this hypothesis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%