With a credence good consumers are never sure about the extent of the good they actually need. Therefore, the seller acts as the expert determining the customers' requirements. This information asymmetry between buyers and the seller creates strong incentives for the seller to cheat. We analyze whether the market mechanism may induce non-fraudulent seller behavior. First, we consider observable and verifiable expert services, i.e., buyers observe how much of the good they get, yet they do not know how much they need. There we distinguish two different scenarios. From the observation of a) capacity and prices or b) just prices consumers attempt to infer the quality of the seller's services. We show for both constellations that profit maximizing credence goods monopolists always choose non-fraudulent behavior. Second, we analyze unobservable expert services, i.e., consumers neither know how much they need nor how much they get. If consumers observe a) capacity and prices, they obtain honest service. If, however, consumer observe b) only prices, no trade takes place.