2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2021.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-utility of a first-trimester screening strategy versus the standard of care for nulliparous women to prevent pre-term pre-eclampsia in Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data were compared to the Belgian (Flemish) general obstetric population. [29][30][31][32][33] Categorical data were presented as absolute frequencies or percentages and were compared using Pearson's Chisquared test or Fisher's Exact test or with binomial tests when only proportions were available. Distribution of continuous variables was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilks test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data were compared to the Belgian (Flemish) general obstetric population. [29][30][31][32][33] Categorical data were presented as absolute frequencies or percentages and were compared using Pearson's Chisquared test or Fisher's Exact test or with binomial tests when only proportions were available. Distribution of continuous variables was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilks test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms that aim to identify women at high risk of preeclampsia by clinical, biological, and ultrasound parameters have been published and have sparked enthusiasm, but the cost effectiveness of their implementation at a population level is still debated [ 25 28 ]. The trial was designed in 2008 and at the time, none of those algorithms were recommended which is why we selected our population differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selv om preeklampsiforekomsten har vaert fallende i Norge (3), tilsier Folkehelseinstitu ets metodevurdering at en bedre screeningmetode vil kunne gi helseøkonomisk gevinst (1). De e samsvarer med studier fra andre land med god svangerskapsomsorg (7,8).…”
Section: «Selv Om Preeklampsiforekomsten Har Vaert Fallende I Norge T...unclassified