2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/917567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Utility Analysis of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Azathioprine Based Regimens for Maintenance Therapy of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

Abstract: Background/Aims. We aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) as maintenance therapy for patients with Class III and Class IV lupus nephritis (LN), from a United States (US) perspective. Methods. Using a Markov model, we conducted a cost-utility analysis from a societal perspective over a lifetime horizon. The modeled population comprised patients with proliferative LN who received maintenance therapy with MMF (2 gm/day) versus AZA (150 mg/day) for 3 years. R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the induction phase, a Markov structure was chosen to model transitions in the maintenance phase, which is consistent with Mohara et al and Nee et al [33,34]. This approach was preferable over a static decision-tree model as it was considered to better represent the time-dependent outcomes associated with LN, and the long time horizon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the induction phase, a Markov structure was chosen to model transitions in the maintenance phase, which is consistent with Mohara et al and Nee et al [33,34]. This approach was preferable over a static decision-tree model as it was considered to better represent the time-dependent outcomes associated with LN, and the long time horizon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Four different treatment regimens combining IVCY, AZA and MMF for long-term (induction and maintenance) therapy in Thailand [33] • MMF and AZA as maintenance treatments from a US perspective [34] • MMF and IVCY as induction treatments from a UK perspective [35] Of the three identified economic models, two were Markov models with analyses conducted over a lifetime horizon [33,34] and one was a patient-level simulation to analyze only the induction phase [35]. Markov models use disease states to represent all possible consequences of an intervention.…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations