2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-utility analysis of LEGO based therapy for school children and young people with autism spectrum disorder: results from a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: ObjectivesTo assess the cost-effectiveness of LEGO-based therapy compared with usual support.DesignCost-utility analysis alongside randomised control trial.SettingMainstream primary and secondary schools in the UK.Participants248 children and young people (CYP) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) aged 7–15 years.InterventionLEGO-based therapy is a group social skills intervention designed specifically for CYP with ASD. Through play, CYP learn to use the skills such as joint attention, sharing, communication an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SURE approach considers the distribution of the dependent variable as well as the correlation between cost and QALY outcomes [31]; while non-parametric bootstrap re-sampling method was suggested by Briggs and colleagues [43], as the distribution of regression residuals was likely to be skewed [44]. The number of 5000 iterations was chosen because it was considered to be sufficient to generate robust estimates of standard errors [43] and is widely used in trial-based cost-effectiveness analyses for mental health illness [45][46][47]. Covariates, such as baseline utility, cost, age, gender, and study site, were chosen based on the related cost utility analysis (CUA) study for mental health illness [47].…”
Section: Statistical and Economic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SURE approach considers the distribution of the dependent variable as well as the correlation between cost and QALY outcomes [31]; while non-parametric bootstrap re-sampling method was suggested by Briggs and colleagues [43], as the distribution of regression residuals was likely to be skewed [44]. The number of 5000 iterations was chosen because it was considered to be sufficient to generate robust estimates of standard errors [43] and is widely used in trial-based cost-effectiveness analyses for mental health illness [45][46][47]. Covariates, such as baseline utility, cost, age, gender, and study site, were chosen based on the related cost utility analysis (CUA) study for mental health illness [47].…”
Section: Statistical and Economic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of 5000 iterations was chosen because it was considered to be sufficient to generate robust estimates of standard errors [43] and is widely used in trial-based cost-effectiveness analyses for mental health illness [45][46][47]. Covariates, such as baseline utility, cost, age, gender, and study site, were chosen based on the related cost utility analysis (CUA) study for mental health illness [47]. Phobia type and ADIS CSR scores were chosen because they reflect the disease type and severity, which are considered by experts to be relevant to costs and QALYs.…”
Section: Statistical and Economic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health economics analysis results indicate that, compared to usual support only, LEGO ® based therapy and usual support produced marginal but robust reduction in costs and improvement in quality-adjusted life years from both perspectives, suggesting it is likely to be cost-effective. Details and results are reported elsewhere ( Wang et al, 2022a ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high rates of co-occurring emotional and behavioural difficulties reported for most autistic children and young people, and the importance of investigating the potential impact of LEGO ® based therapy on other aspects of everyday functioning, a range of standardised measures were used to assess secondary objectives including perceived isolation, academic competence, assertion, social control, externalising and internalising, and emotional and behavioural symptoms. Intervention cost-effectiveness, fidelity and acceptability were also investigated and are reported elsewhere ( Barr et al, 2022 ; Wang et al, 2022a ; Wright et al, in press ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation