2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost savings analysis of intrawound vancomycin powder in posterior spinal surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
66
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the clinical benefits of prophylactic stabilization have been well established, no studies to our knowledge, have provided a cost analysis comparing costs of this treatment option with the costs of providing care to patients after pathologic fractures have occurred. With the current healthcare focus on cost and value of treatments, physicians should be aware of relative costs of their treatment options [4,5,8,9,14,15,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the clinical benefits of prophylactic stabilization have been well established, no studies to our knowledge, have provided a cost analysis comparing costs of this treatment option with the costs of providing care to patients after pathologic fractures have occurred. With the current healthcare focus on cost and value of treatments, physicians should be aware of relative costs of their treatment options [4,5,8,9,14,15,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rest, 11 studies were checked in full-text. Three studies [15,18,20] were excluded because of inadequate data on deep infection, deep infection was not determined by bacterial culture and the lack of follow-up information, respectively. Finally, eight studies [5,[12][13][14]16,17,21,22]were included in this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in health care cost is significant considering the vancomycin powder only costs 12-44 US dollars per case [12,18,20]. The reduction of care cost could represent another advantage of this technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Именно снижение активно-сти остеобластов и их гибель приво-дят к развитию псевдоартроза -одной из основных нежелательных лекар-ственных реакций при использова-нии ванкомицина [25]. Доза порошка ванкомицина при его местном при-менении с целью профилактики раз-вития ИОХВ у пациентов после опе-раций на позвоночнике в различ-ных клинических сериях варьирует от 1 до 2 г, но большинство исследо-вателей сходятся во мнении, что пре-парат необходимо равномерно рас-пределять по всей площади раневого канала [6,9,11,12,15,17,21,27,31]. Проведение дальнейших исследова-ний in vivo необходимо для опреде-ления оптимальных доз порошка ван-комицина при его местном примене-нии, с одновременным сохранением высокой антибактериальной активно-сти и нивелированием нежелательных лекарственных реакций.…”
Section: рисunclassified