1992
DOI: 10.1109/24.126665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost optimization of maintenance scheduling for a system with assured reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a new personal computer will not have exactly the same type of CPU as the replaced old computer since the CPU of the replaced computer may be phased out. It seems that the PM model found in literature (e.g., Nakagawa [5] and Jayabalan and Chaudhuri [3]), which are under the assumption of infinite time span, might not be suitable for the above case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For example, a new personal computer will not have exactly the same type of CPU as the replaced old computer since the CPU of the replaced computer may be phased out. It seems that the PM model found in literature (e.g., Nakagawa [5] and Jayabalan and Chaudhuri [3]), which are under the assumption of infinite time span, might not be suitable for the above case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The proper maintenance intervals to overcome the overall losses of generation caused by severe failures of crucial equipment in power stations play an important role in the industry. Many researchers have investigated methods of determining the proper maintenance intervals [1][2][3]. Maintenance and operational scheduling of power plants have been studied [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lie and Chun [7] formulate a cost model where pm is performed whenever the system reaches the predetermined maximum failure rate. Jayabalan and Chaudhuri [5] have obtained the optimal replacement policy for a specific period of time where downtime for installation and pm were assumed to be negligible. This article considers downtime for replacement as constant, since the system is replaced by a new similar system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%