Cost of providing doctors in remote and vulnerable areas: Programa Mais Médicos in Brazil

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the Programa Mais Médicos (More Doctors Program; PMM) in Brazil by estimating the proportional increase in the number of doctors in participating muni­cipalities and the program costs, stratified by cost component and funding source. Methods Official data from the 2013 edition of Demografia Médica no Brasil (Medical Demography in Brazil) was used to estimate the number of doctors prior to PMM. The number of doctors at the end of the fourth PMM recruiting cycle (July 2014) was obtained from the Ministry of Health. Cost components were identified and estimated based on PMM legislation and guidelines. The participating municipalities were chosen based on four criteria, all related to vulnerability. Results The PMM provided an additional 14 462 physicians to highly vulnerable, remote areas in 3 785 municipalities (68% of the total) and 34 Special Indigenous Sanitary Districts. There was a greater increase of physicians in the poorest regions (North and Northeast). The estimated annual cost of US$ 1.1 billion covered medical provision, continuing education, and supervision/mentoring. Funding was largely centralized at the federal level (92.6%). Conclusion The cost of PMM is considered relatively moderate in comparison to its potential benefits for population health. The greater increase of doctors for the poorest and most vulnerable met the target of correcting imbalances in health worker distribution. The PMM experience in Brazil can contribute to the debate on reducing physician shortages.

Addressing inequalities in medical workforce distribution: evidence from a quasi-experimental study in Brazil

“…What are the benefits for the Brazilian government implementing the programme, compared with the total costs of the MDP? Table 5 estimates the total benefits (the reduction in costs) for the government from 2014 to 2017 (table 5, column 6), as a percentage of the total costs of the MDP, which account for more than $1 billion per year (Table 5, column 1 and as computed in Silva et al 35).…”

A Checklist for Implementing Rural Pathways to Train, Develop and Support Health Workers in Low and Middle-Income Countries

“…• How can the partnership be sustained? (7,8,23,25,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43) Existing workers and their scope…”

“…Of these strategies, investing in "grow your own" educational approaches (selecting and training health workers in rural areas) are considered as a mainstay. They particularly play a role in achieving a skilled and satisfied rural workforce, over relying on regulatory strategies like obligatory rural service requirements (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). However, educational strategies are some of the most complicated to translate into practice because they involve multiple stakeholders and complex actions at different systems levels.…”

Regionalização em saúde em Minas Gerais: uma análise da percepção dos representantes de Comissões Intergestores Regionais

“…Nesse contexto, é importante destacar que no Brasil existem desequilíbrios regionais importantes no acesso aos serviços de média e alta complexidade e na oferta de especialidades médicas (RIBEIRO et al, 2017;SILVA et al, 2017;SILVA et al, 2018). A fixação de profissionais de saúde em áreas remotas e rurais e nas periferias rurais-urbanas é um importante desafio enfrentado pelo sistema de saúde brasileiro (BRASIL, 2013;SILVA et al, 2018). Em Minas Gerais, diante da grande diversidade territorial, algumas regiões ampliadas de saúde, como o Jequitinhonha e as regiões Oeste e Norte, apresentam menor desenvolvimento socioeconômico, menor capacidade de oferta de serviços e maior dificuldade de fixação de profissionais (MOREIRA; FERRÉ; ANDRADE, 2017).…”