2016 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/igbsg.2016.7539450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost implication and reactive power generating potential of the synchronous condenser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So how cost-effective would synchronous compensators be? There is a range of cost estimates in the literature [132,[142][143][144], the highest being an investment cost of 100 A C/kVAr with fixed operating and maintenance costs of 3.5 A C/kVAr/a [144] (it would be around a third cheaper to retrofit existing generators [132]). For Great Britain, the 9 GVAr of SC would cost 129 million A C per year, assuming a lifetime of 30 years and a discount rate of 10%.…”
Section: Their Feasibility Criterion 4: Ancillary Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So how cost-effective would synchronous compensators be? There is a range of cost estimates in the literature [132,[142][143][144], the highest being an investment cost of 100 A C/kVAr with fixed operating and maintenance costs of 3.5 A C/kVAr/a [144] (it would be around a third cheaper to retrofit existing generators [132]). For Great Britain, the 9 GVAr of SC would cost 129 million A C per year, assuming a lifetime of 30 years and a discount rate of 10%.…”
Section: Their Feasibility Criterion 4: Ancillary Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchronous condensers could be used to avoid power electronics interfaces. However, these devices lack the ability to control active power discharge and have costly maintenance requirements [19]. As discussed in [20], communication-based protection schemes, such as current differential, permissive overreaching transfer trip (POTT), and directional comparison blocking (DCB), provide improved protection without requiring radial systems.…”
Section: Of 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portanto, para postergar ou evitar o colapso de tensão recomenda-se a colocação em serviço do maior número de bancos de capacitores, bem como a redução de perdas na transmissão, de forma a assegurar que os geradores, compensadores síncronos, SVC e STATCON operem com uma maior margem de reativos (Cigre 1989). Também, quando comparados aos compensadores estáticos de var, os custos (8 US$/Kvar) dos bancos de capacitores comutados mecanicamente são da ordem de cinco a seis vezes menores que os do SVC (40 US$/Kvar) e do STATCON (50 US$/Kvar) (Acharya et al 2005, Igbinovia et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified