2018
DOI: 10.2514/1.c034664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Estimating Model for Aircraft Maintenance

Abstract: The present work provides a method for maintenance cost estimation for a civil aircraft. The model evaluates maintenance costs at a subsystem level in order to quantify the effective impact of each aircraft part on the total maintenance cost. An analysis at the subsystem level can offer a more precise cost estimation because the most influential parameters (that is, the cost drivers) should be different for each aircraft part. Emphasis is given on the updating of a cost-estimating model proposed in 1966 that p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, an MRO to be competitive must have efficient, efficacious, and effective management. The cost imputed to an aircraft by an MRO is due to the following aspects: direct maintenance cost, including direct labor and materials needed for maintenance tasks, and maintenance burden, including airline overhead, acquisition and maintaining cost of equipment, tools, buildings facilities, and other indirect costs [17]. In addition, meaningful is the opportunity cost due to the number of days for which an aircraft is out of service since inhibited revenue is a virtual disbursement [18].…”
Section: Aircraft Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, an MRO to be competitive must have efficient, efficacious, and effective management. The cost imputed to an aircraft by an MRO is due to the following aspects: direct maintenance cost, including direct labor and materials needed for maintenance tasks, and maintenance burden, including airline overhead, acquisition and maintaining cost of equipment, tools, buildings facilities, and other indirect costs [17]. In addition, meaningful is the opportunity cost due to the number of days for which an aircraft is out of service since inhibited revenue is a virtual disbursement [18].…”
Section: Aircraft Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SRJ 2 needs teams of technicians with the triple (9, 5, 3), (13,7,4), and (16,10,6) to complete at least 50% (orange), 90% (yellow), and precisely 100% (green) of the sampled population, respectively, but the last team allocation is infeasible. The LRJ needs teams of technicians with the triple (17,7,4), (21, 10, 5), and (24, 12, 7) to complete at least 50% (orange), 90% (yellow), and precisely 100% (green) of the sampled population, respectively, but the last allocation is infeasible, i.e., 40 technicians allowed is exceeded. This feature extraction from the scenarios and the other data of the case study allows concluding that, due to the available 63 technicians, only at least 50% of the sampled scenarios are possible to be completed.…”
Section: Facilities Lrj (%) Srj (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance cost can be estimated using the approach proposed in Ref. 16 In particular, the method consists on the updating of a costestimating model proposed in 1966 that provided equations for the maintenance cost assessment.…”
Section: Cers For Doc Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 As far as maintenance cost is concerned, the inputs required by the methodology proposed in Ref. 16 are reported in Table 4.…”
Section: Conventional Regional Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the overhaul cost of a medium-sized APU is around $280,000 and typically takes 1–2 months for the turnover of parts, which puts great pressure on the operators. 1 In particular, with the extension of the time limit for extended-range twin-engine operations (ETOPS), the reliability of APU becomes critical. 2,3 A recent study shows that APUs can be an important source of air pollutant emissions at major airport in urban areas depending on the level of fuel usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%