Cost Engineering Techniques and Their Applicability for Cost Estimation of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems

Abstract

Abstract:The potential of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems is acknowledged by both considerable research and development efforts and an increasing number of applications. Most research aims at improving ORC systems through technical performance optimization of various cycle architectures and working fluids. The assessment and optimization of technical feasibility is at the core of ORC development. Nonetheless, economic feasibility is often decisive when it comes down to considering practical instalments, and therefore an increasing number of publications include an estimate of the costs of the designed ORC system. Various methods are used to estimate ORC costs but the resulting values are rarely discussed with respect to accuracy and validity. The aim of this paper is to provide insight into the methods used to estimate these costs and open the discussion about the interpretation of these results. A review of cost engineering practices shows there has been a long tradition of industrial cost estimation. Several techniques have been developed, but the expected accuracy range of the best techniques used in research varies between 10% and 30%. The quality of the estimates could be improved by establishing up-to-date correlations for the ORC industry in particular. Secondly, the rapidly growing ORC cost literature is briefly reviewed. A graph summarizing the estimated ORC investment costs displays a pattern of decreasing costs for increasing power output. Knowledge on the actual costs of real ORC modules and projects remains scarce. Finally, the investment costs of a known heat recovery ORC system are discussed and the methodologies and accuracies of several approaches are demonstrated using this case as benchmark. The best results are obtained with factorial estimation techniques such as the module costing technique, but the accuracies may diverge by up to +30%. Development of correlations and multiplication factors for ORC technology in particular is likely to improve the quality of the estimates.

Techno-Economic Analysis of Biomass Integrated Electricity Generation System

“…When the costs of a component are known but its capacity differs from that of the to-be-estimated component, the costs can be roughly estimated using the correlation known as the Capacity Exponent Ratio Method [26] ( 11) where c and A respectively represent the purchase costs and the equipment cost attribute of the required component (c a and A a ) and the known component (c b and A b ) and n is the exponent used to correlate the costs. Equation (11) provides only rough approximations of the actual costs.…”

“…The most straightforward manner to update historical data is by means of composite cost indices, using the equation [26] where c j and c i refer to the costs in year j and i respectively, and I j and I i are the cost indices for the respective years.…”

“…required for the equipment and the installation thereof), indirect costs (engineering, construction costs and contingencies) and other outlays (such as start-up costs, working capital, etc.) This is the one-time cost occurring at the beginning of the project [26]. Gasification Unit With reference to [26], the average specific capital cost of a 30 -500kW gasifier costs USD 500/kW.…”

Thermo-Economic Performance Analysis of a Regenerative Superheating Organic Rankine Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery

“…Generally, there are inherent uncertainties resulting in deviations between actual and estimated capital costs. The preliminary cost estimation techniques mentioned have an accuracy ranging from −20% to +30% [30]. Table 1.…”

Small Scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Techno-Economic Review

“…Therefore, the calculated nominal discount rate is 6.08%. Lemmens [6], in his cost analysis for a 375-kW ORC system, considers that the integration costs are 11% of the total cost of the plant. The impact of the installation costs decreases with the size of the plant.…”