2015
DOI: 10.4335/13.3.789-807(2015)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost Efficiency of Public Procurement at Local Level: Chances for Improvement of Local Self-government and Public Enterprises in Serbia

Abstract: This paper analyses cost efficiency of the public procurement process at local level. Data is gathered in the Serbian environment, and our main hypothesis is that efficiency of public procurement can be improved significantly by the practices of organizational design and external benchmarking, measured by transaction costs. In order to prove this hypothesis, we have described case of major inefficiencies during public procurement process, and then analyzed efficiency of public procurement process, measured in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pavel (2018) evaluated the private transaction costs of participating in tenders and the main factors impacting their value, based on questionnaire results (804 observations). An attempt to analyse the cost efficiency of the public procurement process at local level was made on Serbian data (Jasko et al, 2015). Administrative cost savings with the use of micro data is measured in Singer et al (2009) for analysing the efficiency of a new electronic system of public procurement in Chile.…”
Section: Literature Review: Approaches To Evaluation Of Procurement Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pavel (2018) evaluated the private transaction costs of participating in tenders and the main factors impacting their value, based on questionnaire results (804 observations). An attempt to analyse the cost efficiency of the public procurement process at local level was made on Serbian data (Jasko et al, 2015). Administrative cost savings with the use of micro data is measured in Singer et al (2009) for analysing the efficiency of a new electronic system of public procurement in Chile.…”
Section: Literature Review: Approaches To Evaluation Of Procurement Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding the increased recognition of the importance and relevance of the issue of public procurement costs, few empirical studies have been conducted to explore it. Most of the existing ones focused on assessment of the costs of an organization or project (see, e.g., Gardenal, 2013;Jasko, Jovanovic and Cudanov, 2015;Costantino et al, 2012, Balaeva andYakovlev, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transaction costs may be defined as costs related to the activity that need to be performed to transfer a specific product or service from one organizational system into another (Jaško, Čudanov, Jevtić & Krivokapić, 2013), and in case of public procurement, from bidder to contracting authority (Jaško, Jovanović & Čudanov, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance for this model the elapsed time per procedure (in working days) is the KPI for measuring the efficiency of purchasing and HR employed per procedure is the KPI for measuring the effectiveness. The Serbian authors (Jasko et al, 2015) analyse the cost efficiency of the public procurement process at local level. The efficiency measured in hours per public procurement on a basis of directly invested hours in the public Serbian enterprises.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the benefits have been the focus of attention, the administrative costs borne by the main participants in the procurement process -customers, suppliers, and regulators -have been disregarded. Meanwhile, conducting the public procurement policy requires knowledge on these costs, and identifying the biggest generators of costs, in order to take measures aimed at reducing the costs and increasing the costeffectiveness of public procurement procedures (Jasko et al, 2015). Experts argue, however, that such costs can be high, making some procurement procedures inefficient (especially for small purchases).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%