2016
DOI: 10.2471/blt.15.164418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost–effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons

Abstract: Cost–effectiveness analysis is used to compare the costs and outcomes of alternative policy options. Each resulting cost–effectiveness ratio represents the magnitude of additional health gained per additional unit of resources spent. Cost–effectiveness thresholds allow cost–effectiveness ratios that represent good or very good value for money to be identified. In 2001, the World Health Organization’s Commission on Macroeconomics in Health suggested cost–effectiveness thresholds based on multiples of a country’… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
476
0
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 560 publications
(497 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
476
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The WHO initially recommended that the WTP threshold per DALY averted be set at one to three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita [64], but recently re-emphasised that decisions need to be context-specific and that other factors, such as feasibility and budget impact, should also be considered [65]. This guidance is in line with recent studies that have suggested that the WTP threshold should be much lower [66,67].…”
Section: Chapter 1 Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The WHO initially recommended that the WTP threshold per DALY averted be set at one to three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita [64], but recently re-emphasised that decisions need to be context-specific and that other factors, such as feasibility and budget impact, should also be considered [65]. This guidance is in line with recent studies that have suggested that the WTP threshold should be much lower [66,67].…”
Section: Chapter 1 Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The World Health Organization considers interventions whose cost per qualityadjusted life-year (QALY) gained is less than per capita GDP to be ''very costeffective'' (Bertram et al 2016); Mexico's per capita GDP in 2011 was $10,307.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55,56 Recently WHO recommended not using these thresholds, alone, as a decision rule for funding decisions. 57 This systematic review identified a significant association between the conclusions of vaccines cost-effectiveness and pharmaceutical industry sponsorship (p < 0.012). Pharmaceutical industry sponsored studies were significantly more likely to report more favorable results than government or academic sponsored studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%